I'll also add that Amber 18 brings with it significant performance improvements (in some cases > 20%) over Amber 16 on the same hardware. I'll be updating the GPU benchmarks page over the weekend to reflect the new performance benchmarks so please stay tuned.
> On Apr 17, 2018, at 16:40, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, Dave Cerutti wrote:
>
>> ... and for anyone interested in
>> undertaking a significant MD project it is worthwhile to buy into the GPU
>> power offered with the licensed version.
>
> Just my nitpick here, although it is not completely unimportant:
>
> Both AmberTools and Amber are distributed via licenses that you must
> agree to in order to use the codes: these are GPLv3 for AmberTools, and
> a more restrictive license (see our web page) for Amber.
>
> The distinction Dave is referring to above is probably that AmberTools
> has no license *fee*, in contrast to Amber.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Apr 18 2018 - 07:00:03 PDT
