Re: [AMBER] AMBER/ORCA for QM/MM

From: <minyuan.mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:23:16 +0800

Hi,

My QM/MM calculations failed using amber/orca.
The prmtop and crd files come from the online tutorial http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial2/section3.htm.
*******************************************************************************************************************
My workstations: 16 CPU, one GPU, single computer, openmpi
*******************************************************************************************************************
Here is the input file:
Initial min of our structure QMMM
 &cntrl
  imin=1, maxcyc=500, ncyc=200,
  cut=8.0, ntb=1, ntc=2, ntf=2,
  ifqnt=1
 /
 &qmmm
  qmmask=':1-2',
  qmcharge=0,
  spin=1,
  qm_theory='EXTERN',
  qmshake=1,
  qm_ewald=0
 /
 &orc
  method='blyp',
  basis='svp',
  charge=0
 /

*****************************************************************************************************************************
Here is the QM part in output file:
 3.1 QM CALCULATION INFO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WARNING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| Not all MPI implementations fully support system calls that execute
| MPI parallel programs. In this case it will not be possible to run
| MPI parallel versions of both sander and the external QM program.
| !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

| Please also cite the following work for the use of the QM/MM interface:

| A. W. G"otz, M. A. Clark, R. C. Walker
| "An extensible interface for ab initio QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations
| with AMBER"
| J. Comput. Chem. 35 (2014) 95-108.
| DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23444

 Constants for unit conversion taken from
 Mohr, Taylor, Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 633-730
 and using the thermochemical calorie (1 cal = 4.184 J):

 A_TO_BOHRS = 1.889726132873E+00
 AU_TO_KCAL = 6.2750946943E+02
 AU_TO_DEBYE = 2.54174623E+00

>>> Running QM calculation with Orca <<<

 SANDER BOMB in subroutine get_namelist (qm2_extern_orc_module)
 The charge and spin keywords are deprecated
 Please specify charge (qmcharge) and spin multiplicity (spin) in the &qmmm namelist.

********************************************************************************************************************
Here is the message in command line:
:~/orca/projects/NMA$ mpirun -np 8 sander.MPI -O -i min_qmmm.in -o min_qmmm.out -p NMA.prmtop -c NMA.inpcrd -r min_qmmm.rst
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode 1.

NOTE: invoking MPI_ABORT causes Open MPI to kill all MPI processes.
You may or may not see output from other processes, depending on
exactly when Open MPI kills them.

*************************************************************************************************************************

How to solve this problem?
Looking forward to hear your help.

BestWishes,
Yuan Min


minyuan.mail.ustc.edu.cn
 
From: Goetz, Andreas
Date: 2018-02-27 05:04
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: Re: [AMBER] AMBER/ORCA for QM/MM
The interface will work with Orca versions 3 (e.g. 3.0.3) and 4 (e.g. 4.0.2). See also previous messages on this mailing list http://archive.ambermd.org/201707/0486.html
 
Link atoms work exactly as with the built-in semiempirical and DFTB methods. They will be added automatically if your QM/MM boundary crosses covalent bonds. Make sure to cut only across single bonds and not across polar bonds, i.e. C-C single bonds typically are appropriate. See also the Amber manual.
 
All the best,
Andy

Dr. Andreas W. Goetz
Assistant Research Scientist
San Diego Supercomputer Center
Tel: +1-858-822-4771
Email: agoetz.sdsc.edu
Web: www.awgoetz.de
 
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:24 AM, minyuan.mail.ustc.edu.cn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use AMBER/ORCA to achieve QM/MM calculations.
> Which version of ORCA program is supported by AMBER16?
>
> For tutorial I only find one in which boundaries of QM an MM atoms are not involved.
> How to deal with the QM-MM boundary if they are linked via covalent bonds?
>
> Looking forward to hear your reply.
>
> BestWishes,
> YuanMin
>
>
> minyuan.mail.ustc.edu.cn
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
 
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 28 2018 - 19:30:02 PST
Custom Search