Re: [AMBER] restraint_wt applied to wrong atoms

From: sangita kachhap <nckachap.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:02:50 +0100

Thanks Carlos, I am redoing the calculation.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Carlos Simmerling <
carlos.simmerling.gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, it affects your trajectory and the results will differ from those
> where the restraints were applied to different atoms. Will it make your
> trajectory "wrong"? It's very hard to say- but in any case, you would need
> to clearly explain this mistake in any publication of the data, so I would
> probably redo the calculation with the correct atom mask unless it's
> impossible to do so.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:14 AM, sangita kachhap <nckachap.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am doing MD simulation of protein-ligand complex. I was needed to apply
> > restraint_wt on protein backbone and ligand heavy atoms only during
> > minimization (50 kcal/mol −Å) and heating (5 kcal/mol −Å) but by mistake
> I
> > applied it to all the atoms of ligand and some of the TIP3P water
> molecules
> > along with protein backbone. I have done NPT equilibration for 2.4 ns
> > before production run.
> >
> > I have a question, will it affect the MD calculations from the scenario
> > when I don't have to apply restraint on ligand's hydrogen atoms and some
> of
> > the TIP3P water molecules?
> >
> > Thanks
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Oct 30 2017 - 06:30:02 PDT
Custom Search