Re: [AMBER] Query regarding water-water interaction potential in GIST output

From: Rakesh Srivastava <allahabad.21.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:52:07 +0530

Thanks Steven..

Rakesh Srivastava
Research Fellow
School of Computational & Integrative Sciences
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067
India


On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Steven Ramsey <vpsramsey.gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Rakesh,
>
> The water-water energies reported in GIST are indeed corrected to avoid
> double counting. The 'unreferenced' refers to the energies being determined
> directly from the sampled frames and not compared to some reference
> quantity (such as bulk).
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --Steve
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Rakesh Srivastava <allahabad.21.gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Please let me know that, the unreferenced water-water interaction
> potential
> > we get in GIST output, has been corrected for double counting or not ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Rakesh Srivastava
> > Research Fellow
> > School of Computational & Integrative Sciences
> > Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067
> > India
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 29 2017 - 21:30:02 PDT
Custom Search