Dear Marcos,
I think I figured out.
I run these commands to check the charges on TYR "HH", it is zero as expected.
parmed -p model_sol.altered.parm7 -c model_sol.altered.rst7 <<_EOF
printDetails .7780-7800
_EOF
/^^^/ /]
/ ] / ]
_______/ ]___ / ]
/ \_____/ /
_/ [.] \ \ \
/.. | | ]
VVVvvv\ | | _/\ ]
P A R M E D | / \ ]
AAA^^^^^ / \]
\_________\ \_____/
\ \
\____\
ParmEd: a Parameter file Editor
Loaded Amber topology file model_sol.altered.parm7 with coordinates from model_sol.altered.rst7
Reading input from STDIN...
> >
The mask .7780-7800 matches 21 atoms:
ATOM RES RESNAME NAME TYPE At.# LJ Radius LJ Depth Mass Charge GB Radius GB Screen
7780 517 TYR N N 7 1.8240 0.1700 14.0100 -0.4157 1.5500 0.7900
7781 517 TYR H H 1 0.6000 0.0157 1.0080 0.2719 1.3000 0.8500
7782 517 TYR CA CX 6 1.9080 0.1094 12.0100 -0.0014 1.7000 0.7200
7783 517 TYR HA H1 1 1.3870 0.0157 1.0080 0.0876 1.2000 0.8500
7784 517 TYR CB CT 6 1.9080 0.1094 12.0100 -0.0858 1.7000 0.7200
7785 517 TYR HB2 HC 1 1.4870 0.0157 1.0080 0.0190 1.2000 0.8500
7786 517 TYR HB3 HC 1 1.4870 0.0157 1.0080 0.0190 1.2000 0.8500
7787 517 TYR CG CA 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 -0.2130 1.7000 0.7200
7788 517 TYR CD1 CA 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 -0.1030 1.7000 0.7200
7789 517 TYR HD1 HA 1 1.4590 0.0150 1.0080 0.1320 1.2000 0.8500
7790 517 TYR CE1 CA 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 -0.4980 1.7000 0.7200
7791 517 TYR HE1 HA 1 1.4590 0.0150 1.0080 0.1320 1.2000 0.8500
7792 517 TYR CZ C 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 0.7770 1.7000 0.7200
7793 517 TYR OH OH 8 1.7210 0.2104 16.0000 -0.8140 1.5000 0.8500
7794 517 TYR HH HO 1 0.0000 0.0000 1.0080 0.0000 1.2000 0.8500
7795 517 TYR CE2 CA 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 -0.4980 1.7000 0.7200
7796 517 TYR HE2 HA 1 1.4590 0.0150 1.0080 0.1320 1.2000 0.8500
7797 517 TYR CD2 CA 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 -0.1030 1.7000 0.7200
7798 517 TYR HD2 HA 1 1.4590 0.0150 1.0080 0.1320 1.2000 0.8500
7799 517 TYR C C 6 1.9080 0.0860 12.0100 0.5973 1.7000 0.7200
7800 517 TYR O O 8 1.6612 0.2100 16.0000 -0.5679 1.5000 0.8500
thank you.
Regards
SOwmya
________________________________________
From: Sowmya Indrakumar
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 3:41 PM
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: RE: [AMBER] Deprotonation of Tyr using Parmed
Dear Marcos,
Thanks for you're suggestions.
This is what I tried. using the parameter and topology files generated from H++ at the desired pH, I run parmed "changeProtstate" command to change the protonated TYR to deprotonated TYR form.
These are the commands:parmed -p model_sol.parm7 -c model_sol.rst7 <<_EOF
> changeProtState .1415-1435 1
> changeProtState .2786-2806 1
> changeProtState .6410-6430 1
> changeProtState .7780-7800 1
> parmout model_sol.altered.parm7 model_sol.altered.rst7
> _EOF
/^^^/ /]
/ ] / ]
_______/ ]___ / ]
/ \_____/ /
_/ [.] \ \ \
/.. | | ]
VVVvvv\ | | _/\ ]
P A R M E D | / \ ]
AAA^^^^^ / \]
\_________\ \_____/
\ \
\____\
ParmEd: a Parameter file Editor
Loaded Amber topology file model_sol.parm7 with coordinates from model_sol.rst7
Reading input from STDIN...
> Changing protonation state of residue 95 (TYR) to 1
> Changing protonation state of residue 188 (TYR) to 1
> Changing protonation state of residue 426 (TYR) to 1
> Changing protonation state of residue 517 (TYR) to 1
> > Outputting Amber topology file model_sol.altered.parm7 and restart model_sol.altered.rst7
Done!
the PDB file from: ambpdb -p model_sol.altered.parm7 -c restart model_sol.altered.rst7 > model.pdb, TYRs still exist as Protonated. Ideally, the HH atom record should have disappered. Is it something wrong I am doing?
ATOM 1415 N TYR 95 48.608 43.117 57.661 1.00 0.00 N
ATOM 1416 H TYR 95 49.228 43.202 56.867 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1417 CA TYR 95 49.122 42.559 58.899 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1418 HA TYR 95 48.685 43.093 59.745 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1419 CB TYR 95 48.741 41.081 59.036 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1420 HB2 TYR 95 49.170 40.683 59.955 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1421 HB3 TYR 95 47.657 41.010 59.137 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1422 CG TYR 95 49.174 40.208 57.878 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1423 CD1 TYR 95 50.366 39.487 57.933 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1424 HD1 TYR 95 51.015 39.592 58.790 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1425 CE1 TYR 95 50.752 38.667 56.886 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1426 HE1 TYR 95 51.684 38.123 56.933 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1427 CZ TYR 95 49.935 38.567 55.773 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1428 OH TYR 95 50.305 37.782 54.739 1.00 0.00 O
ATOM 1429 HH TYR 95 51.147 37.344 54.884 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1430 CE2 TYR 95 48.754 39.256 55.686 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1431 HE2 TYR 95 48.143 39.164 54.803 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1432 CD2 TYR 95 48.374 40.075 56.746 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1433 HD2 TYR 95 47.459 40.639 56.679 1.00 0.00 H
ATOM 1434 C TYR 95 50.636 42.787 58.977 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 1435 O TYR 95 51.229 43.279 58.023 1.00 0.00 O
Kindly, comment on this.
Thanks
Regards
Sowmya
________________________________________
From: Marcos Serrou do Amaral [marcossamaral.gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:25 AM
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Deprotonation of Tyr
Hi Sowmya!
>Could you please explain me why you mentioned -state 0 for the TYRs ?? The
default 0 flag in case of TYR is for the protonated state (mentioned in
manual)
The state 0 for TYR is the protonated state (pKa=9.6).
>Also, should the initial pdb file which I use to generate topology and
parameter files, should those specific TYRs already have the deprotonated
atom record ??
I guess so. When you say that you want the TYR residue, the leap will
provide you the titratable TYR residue for CpHMD simulations.
I believe that it should be a good idea to use parmed to set the TYR and
LYS initial states (changeProtState), instead to use it only on cpin file.
Regards
---
Marcos S.A.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Sowmya Indrakumar <soemya.kemi.dtu.dk>
wrote:
> Dear Marcos,
> Thank you for you're suggestions.
>
> Could you please explain me why you mentioned -state 0 for the TYRs ?? The
> default 0 flag in case of TYR is for the protonated state (mentioned in
> manual)
>
> Also, should the initial pdb file which I use to generate topology and
> parameter files, should those specific TYRs already have the deprotonated
> atom record ??
>
> Thank you.
> Regards
> Sowmya
> ________________________________________
> From: Marcos Serrou do Amaral [marcossamaral.gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 9:34 PM
> To: AMBER Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] Deprotonation of Tyr
>
> Dear Sowmya,
> I am not sure how to do that, but I would try:
>
> cpinutil.py -p model_sol.parm7 -igb 2 -o model_sol.cpin -op
> model_sol.mod0.parm7 -resnums 95 188 296 426 517 -states 0 0 0 0 0
>
> and then try to change your cpin file:
>
> STATENE=0.000000,-78.199991,-0.845507,0.000000,
> TO
> STATENE=0.000000,99.99,-99.99,0.000000,
>
> Good luck!
>
> ---
> Marcos S.A.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Sowmya Indrakumar <soemya.kemi.dtu.dk>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I want to keep certain TYR in the deprotonated state and one LYS
> > protonated while performing constpH MD at pH=7.4 and IS= 0.1M
> >
> > I generated the initial cpin file and a new parameter file using the
> below
> > mentioned command:
> >
> > cpinutil.py -p model_sol.parm7 -igb 2 -o model_sol.cpin -op
> > model_sol.mod0.parm7 -resnums 95 188 426 517 296 -states 1 1 1 1 0
> >
> >
> > This is how my cpin file looks:
> >
> > &CNSTPH
> > CHRGDAT=-0.4157,0.2719,-0.0014,0.0876,-0.0152,0.0295,0.
> > 0295,-0.0011,-0.1906,
> > 0.1699,-0.2341,0.1656,0.3226,-0.5579,0.3992,-0.2341,0.1656,-
> > 0.1906,0.1699,
> > 0.5973,-0.5679,-0.4157,0.2719,-0.0014,0.0876,-0.0858,0.019,
> > 0.019,-0.213,-0.103,
> > 0.132,-0.498,0.132,0.777,-0.814,0.0,-0.498,0.132,-0.103,0.
> > 132,0.5973,-0.5679,
> > -0.3479,0.2747,-0.24,0.1426,-0.0094,0.0362,0.0362,0.0187,0.
> > 0103,0.0103,-0.0479,
> > 0.0621,0.0621,-0.0143,0.1135,0.1135,-0.3854,0.34,0.34,0.34,
> > 0.7341,-0.5894,
> > -0.3479,0.2747,-0.24,0.1426,-0.10961,0.034,0.034,0.06612,0.
> 01041,0.01041,
> > -0.03768,0.01155,0.01155,0.32604,-0.03358,-0.03358,-1.
> 03581,0.0,0.38604,
> > 0.38604,0.7341,-0.5894,
> > PROTCNT=0,3,
> > RESNAME='System: Unknown','Residue: TYR 95','Residue: TYR 188',
> > 'Residue: LYS 296','Residue: TYR 426','Residue: TYR 517',
> > RESSTATE=1,1,1,1,0,
> > STATEINF(0)%FIRST_ATOM=1415, STATEINF(0)%FIRST_CHARGE=0,
> > STATEINF(0)%FIRST_STATE=0, STATEINF(0)%NUM_ATOMS=21,
> > STATEINF(0)%NUM_STATES=2,
> > STATEINF(1)%FIRST_ATOM=2786, STATEINF(1)%FIRST_CHARGE=0,
> > STATEINF(1)%FIRST_STATE=0, STATEINF(1)%NUM_ATOMS=21,
> > STATEINF(1)%NUM_STATES=2,
> > STATEINF(2)%FIRST_ATOM=4476, STATEINF(2)%FIRST_CHARGE=42,
> > STATEINF(2)%FIRST_STATE=2, STATEINF(2)%NUM_ATOMS=22,
> > STATEINF(2)%NUM_STATES=2,
> > STATEINF(3)%FIRST_ATOM=6410, STATEINF(3)%FIRST_CHARGE=0,
> > STATEINF(3)%FIRST_STATE=0, STATEINF(3)%NUM_ATOMS=21,
> > STATEINF(3)%NUM_STATES=2,
> > STATEINF(4)%FIRST_ATOM=7780, STATEINF(4)%FIRST_CHARGE=0,
> > STATEINF(4)%FIRST_STATE=0, STATEINF(4)%NUM_ATOMS=21,
> > STATEINF(4)%NUM_STATES=2,
> > STATENE=0.000000,-78.199991,-0.845507,0.000000,
> > TRESCNT=5,CPHFIRST_SOL=10324, CPH_IGB=2, CPH_INTDIEL=1.0,
> > /
> >
> > I manually changed the cpin file " PROTCNT=1,0,3,2," to PROTCNT="0,3,"
> to
> > only consider deprotonated TYR and protonated LYS. Is this the right way?
> >
> >
> > After the equilibration step, *.cpout file looks like this for all time
> > steps:
> >
> > Solvent pH: 7.40000
> > Monte Carlo step size: 500
> > Time step: 500
> > Time: 1000.998
> > Residue 0 State: 0
> > Residue 1 State: 0
> > Residue 2 State: 0
> > Residue 3 State: 0
> > Residue 4 State: 0
> >
> > Residue 0 State: 0
> > Residue 1 State: 0
> > Residue 2 State: 0
> > Residue 3 State: 0
> > Residue 4 State: 0
> >
> > Residue 0 State: 0
> > Residue 1 State: 0
> > Residue 2 State: 0
> > Residue 3 State: 0
> > Residue 4 State: 0
> >
> > Residue 0 State: 0
> > Residue 1 State: 0
> > Residue 2 State: 0
> > Residue 3 State: 0
> > Residue 4 State: 0
> >
> > Does the State 0 above mean, the default state which I have mentioned in
> > the cpin file??
> >
> > Ideally, when I take any random frame after equilibration step and
> > generate a pdb, I should have the deprotonated TYR 95 atom record. But I
> > see the proton present.
> >
> > ATOM 1415 N TYR 95 50.406 44.914 56.235 1.00 0.00
> > N
> > ATOM 1416 H TYR 95 50.688 44.636 55.305 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1417 CA TYR 95 51.132 44.350 57.398 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1418 HA TYR 95 50.852 44.846 58.327 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1419 CB TYR 95 50.486 42.938 57.435 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1420 HB2 TYR 95 50.764 42.428 58.358 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1421 HB3 TYR 95 49.403 43.058 57.460 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1422 CG TYR 95 50.962 41.963 56.336 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1423 CD1 TYR 95 52.192 41.330 56.655 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1424 HD1 TYR 95 52.737 41.608 57.544 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1425 CE1 TYR 95 52.756 40.465 55.709 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1426 HE1 TYR 95 53.777 40.165 55.897 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1427 CZ TYR 95 52.155 40.250 54.423 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1428 OH TYR 95 52.880 39.621 53.479 1.00 0.00
> > O
> > ATOM 1429 HH TYR 95 52.243 39.414 52.791 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1430 CE2 TYR 95 50.991 40.970 54.148 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1431 HE2 TYR 95 50.645 41.009 53.126 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1432 CD2 TYR 95 50.363 41.795 55.070 1.00 0.00
> > C
> > ATOM 1433 HD2 TYR 95 49.499 42.394 54.825 1.00 0.00
> > H
> > ATOM 1434 C TYR 95 52.628 44.429 57.246 1.00 0.00
> > C
> >
> > I kindly need you're comments on this.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > Sowmya
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Sowmya Indrakumar [soemya.kemi.dtu.dk]
> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 5:24 PM
> > To: amber.ambermd.org
> > Subject: [AMBER] Deprotonation of Tyr
> >
> > Dear All,
> > I wish to perform simulations with varying salt concentration of NaCl of
> > upto 200mM at a particular pH=7. I want to keep some of the Tyrosines in
> > the deprotonated state.
> >
> > So here, my question is, Can I perform these simulations using constant
> pH
> > MD? Because, I think concentrations can be adjusted to upto 0.1M.
> >
> > Is there any other way to consider doing the deprotonation?
> > Kindly, give me you're suggestion in this regard.
> > Regards
> > Sowmya
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 22 2017 - 07:30:03 PDT