Re: [AMBER] Atom type assignment by Antechamber

From: Junmei Wang <junmwang.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 11:19:48 -0400

It is right for N in N-acetylpyrrole to be assigned as "n". The atom type
definition priority does not change in GAFF2 (same as that of GAFF).

All the best

Junmei

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Matsuura, Azuma <
matsuura.azuma.jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> The nitrogen atom in a pyrrole molecule should be assigned as "na" by
> its definition, and acutually Antechamber does. However, that in
> N-acetylpyrrole is assigned as "n" by Antechamber.
>
> Is it correct?
>
> In the earlier version of gaff.dat, the following message is listed;
>
> "Defination priority of nitrogen: n>n3, n>n4, n>nh, n2>n, no>n, na>n,
> n4>nh"
>
> Is it still in effect?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> All the best.
> --
> Azuma Matsuura
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 08 2017 - 08:30:04 PDT
Custom Search