Shot in the dark: maybe because this is a distance-based mask you need
reference coordinates (-refc)?
-Dan
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:21 AM Aseel Bala <balaahme.msu.edu> wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, that didn't do it either. I
>
> have played around with the ambmask quite a bit. Even selecting the
>
> individual atoms that make up residue #16 (so using '(.226-240<:3.0)')
>
> doesn't work either with sander.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Aseel
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: David Case [mailto:david.case.rutgers.edu]
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:26 AM
>
> To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] ambmask issue
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, Aseel Bala wrote:
>
>
>
> > 1. Line 92: says Mask :16 <:3.0; matches 4530 atoms.
>
>
>
> This is what has to be fixed, since it leads to the other problems you
>
> mention.
>
>
>
> Wild guess: try removing the space between the "6" and the "<" character.
>
>
>
> ...dac
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> AMBER mailing list
>
> AMBER.ambermd.org
>
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> AMBER mailing list
>
> AMBER.ambermd.org
>
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jan 19 2017 - 08:00:03 PST
