Re: [AMBER] ambmask issue

From: Aseel Bala <>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:20:56 -0500

Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, that didn't do it either. I
have played around with the ambmask quite a bit. Even selecting the
individual atoms that make up residue #16 (so using '(.226-240<:3.0)')
doesn't work either with sander.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Case []
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:26 AM
To: AMBER Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] ambmask issue

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, Aseel Bala wrote:

> 1. Line 92: says Mask :16 <:3.0; matches 4530 atoms.

This is what has to be fixed, since it leads to the other problems you

Wild guess: try removing the space between the "6" and the "<" character.


AMBER mailing list

AMBER mailing list
Received on Thu Jan 19 2017 - 07:30:03 PST
Custom Search