Dear Amber users,
I am using TIP4P-Ew water model for a "general-purpose" protein-in-water
simulations at 300K with PME electrostatics and FF14SB field.
Please provide your best guess to the following questions:
1/ Is this (TIP4P-Ew) a good choice of a water model?
2/ Would it still be a good choice of a water model if I want to
simulate at 373K?
3/ Would you say that 4-site water is better than 3-site water (e.g.,
TIP3P) and worth the extra computing power?
4/ Would you say that upgrading to the 5-site water would do a better
job (~ provide more meaningful biological predictions of a protein
behaviour in a water solution)?
Thank you.
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jan 17 2017 - 07:30:04 PST
