On Sun, Jan 08, 2017, FyD wrote:
>
>
> that being said - an error of +/- 0.001 i.e. +/-
> 0.0010 for a charge accuracy of 1.10-4 (i.e. 0.0001) is _not_ normal
Are we sure what the error we are talking about is? Is there a simple
example that shows this?
In my experience, the internal charges for am1-bcc always add to zero;
if they are only printed out to three decimal places, then the usual rounding
effects may mean that the sum of the *printed charges* is different from zero.
But you seem to be referencing some deeper error, and an example would be most
helpful.
Apologies if I missed the post that had a good test case.
...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Jan 08 2017 - 19:00:02 PST
