[AMBER] PBSA: sasopt=0 incompatible with eneopt=4, frcopt=5

From: Vlad Cojocaru <vlad.cojocaru.mpi-muenster.mpg.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:23:42 +0200

Dear Ray, Dear Amber (PBSA) users,

I noticed that whenever I try the option sasopt=0 (solvent excluded
surface as molecular surfaces in PB calculations) in combination with
eneopt=4 and frcopt=5 for non-linear PB I get a segmentation fault. When
changing to eneopt=1 and frcopt=0, the calculation runs fine.

I went back at the Wang et al paper 2012 where the sasopt=0 option is
described but I could not find any particular hint on why this should be
incompatible with eneopt=4 and frcopt=5 ... But sure, maybe (probably) I
am missing something ....

Is there any explanation for this behavior ?

Thanks for answering

Best wishes
Vlad

-- 
Dr. Vlad Cojocaru
Computational Structural Biology Laboratory
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
Röntgenstrasse 20, 48149 Münster, Germany
Tel: +49-251-70365-324; Fax: +49-251-70365-399
Email: vlad.cojocaru[at]mpi-muenster.mpg.de
http://www.mpi-muenster.mpg.de/43241/cojocaru
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Oct 18 2016 - 04:00:03 PDT
Custom Search