Re: [AMBER] on antechamber

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:24:29 -0600

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Brett <brettliu123.163.com> wrote:
> For processing by antechamber, should be the PDB for the ligand with H atoms, or the H atoms of the ligand in the PDB can be omitted?

The file should contain everything you eventually want to simulate, so
in general yes you want H atoms present.

-Dan

>
>
> I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
>
>
> Brett
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber



-- 
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 307
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-6208 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Apr 18 2016 - 07:30:03 PDT
Custom Search