Re: [AMBER] On alphabetizing impropers

From: Brent Krueger <kruegerb.hope.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:22:47 -0400

Indeed, CN and CB are the two atoms that join the two rings in TRP. (and
in purines both of these atoms are type CB) -- Thanks Dave!


On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:00 PM, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, Brent Krueger wrote:
>
> > While we are here talking about impropers, can someone explain to me why
> we
> > leave two of the improper dihedrals in TRP undefined (C*-CN-CB-CA
> > and NA-CA-CN-CB)? I presume this is obvious to some in the group and
> that
> > they are just unnecessary because things stay appropriately planar
> without
> > them, but I've always been curious about this.
>
> Are these the impropers around the two atoms that are common to both rings
> in
> TRP? We found out back in 1986 (see the first all-atom force field paper)
> that the out-of-plane vibrational frequencies could be matched rather well
> without including those impropers (i.e. by setting their force constants to
> zero). Same thing for the briding atoms in purines, as I recall. Might be
> worth re-visiting now that we have better quantum mechanics. (Not sure
> what
> ff14ipq does with this...)
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
_______________________________________________
Brent P. Krueger.....................phone:   616 395 7629
Professor.................................fax:       616 395 7118
Hope College..........................Schaap Hall 2120
Department of Chemistry
Holland, MI     49423
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Mar 24 2016 - 09:30:10 PDT
Custom Search