Re: [AMBER] PMF

From: Barbault Florent <florent.barbault.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 10:09:16 +0100

Hello,

In this specific case, I think belly is a better option than adding
restraints for the surface.

Regards
Florent


On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:49:56 -0800
  Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> If you're in a hurry to start, I would use a force constant
>comparable
> to that of the bonds - 500 sounds high.
>
> What constant are you using between your ligand and graphene?
>
> Bill
>
> On 1/2/16 10:34 PM, Rasha Alqus wrote:
>> Dear amber users,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am running pmf calculation for my system, where i apply two forces
>>the first one is on to keep my ligand at specific distance from
>>graphene and the other force is applied to graphene ( position
>>restraint)
>>
>> my question is dose using high values of force like 500 on position
>>restrain on graphene effect my calculation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for the help
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

-------------------------------------------------
Dr Florent Barbault
Maitre de conferences / Associate professor

Universite Paris Diderot
Laboratoire ITODYS
15 rue Jean de Baïf, bâtiment Lavoisier
75013 Paris FRANCE
http://florentbarbault.wordpress.com/
tel : (33) 01-57-27-68-61
e-mail : florent.barbault.univ-paris-diderot.fr
-------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Jan 03 2016 - 01:30:03 PST
Custom Search