On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Himanshu Joshi <himanshuphy87.gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Ross,
> Thank you very much for the clarification.
> .
> Regarding the ntr=1 question, here is my input file followed by some lines
> from mdout file.
> I am running pmemd.cuda.MPI with recent updates on AMBER14. After the
> anomaly, I am
> trying some cpu runs also, I will update you soon with the proceedings.
>
> Lipid equilibration
>  &cntrl
>   imin=0,
>   ntx=5,
>   irest=1,
>   ntc=2,
>   ntf=2,
>   tol=0.0000001,
>   nstlim=1000000,
>   ntt=3,
>   gamma_ln=1.0,
>   temp0=300.0,
>   ntpr=5000,
>   ntwr=5000,
>   ntwx=10000,
>   dt=0.002,
>   ig=-1,
>   ntb=2,
>   ntp=2,
>   cut=10.0,
>   ioutfm=1,
>   ntxo=2,
>   ntr=1,
>  /
>  /
>  &ewald
>   skinnb=5, ! Increase skinnb to avoid skinnb errors
>
This will potentially hurt performance quite a bit.  I would suggest
keeping the default.  I know this may cause initial NpT simulations to
crash occasionally at the beginning, but these errors should stop after the
equilibration phase when the box stops shrinking so rapidly.
>  /
> Hold complex fixed
> 10.0              ! Force constant (kcal/(mol Angstroms^2))
> RES 1 684
> END
> END
>
>
>
>
>  NSTEP =     5000   TIME(PS) =     115.000  TEMP(K) =   300.59  PRESS =
> -19.2
>  Etot   =  -1354836.4560  EKtot   =    232224.1094  EPtot      =
> -1587060.5653
>  BOND   =     11059.7680  ANGLE   =     35413.1898  DIHED      =
> 30219.4001
>  1-4 NB =     10644.2777  1-4 EEL =    -39686.4662  VDWAALS    =
> 138379.2243
>  EELEC  =  -1777768.0290  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =
> 4678.0700
>  EAMBER (non-restraint)  =  -1591738.6354
>  EKCMT  =     94470.4812  VIRIAL  =     96232.2583  VOLUME     =
> 4260611.2260
>                                                     Density    =
> 0.9639
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  NSTEP =    10000   TIME(PS) =     125.000  TEMP(K) =   301.34  PRESS =
> -6.9
>  Etot   =  -1355582.3661  EKtot   =    232804.5312  EPtot      =
> -1588386.8973
>  BOND   =     11119.2994  ANGLE   =     35156.3936  DIHED      =
> 30306.2670
>  1-4 NB =     10634.9034  1-4 EEL =    -39622.6550  VDWAALS    =
> 137181.2647
>  EELEC  =  -1777996.0569  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =
> 4833.6864
>  EAMBER (non-restraint)  =  -1593220.5838
>  EKCMT  =     94996.1801  VIRIAL  =     95628.3471  VOLUME     =
> 4219058.6682
>                                                     Density    =
> 0.9734
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
There's nothing here to suggest that the simulation is not stable with
restraints.
You will have to be more specific.  When do the instabilities occur?
Randomly during the simulation?  Immediately (or very quickly) after
restart?
HTH,
Jason
-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Nov 13 2015 - 13:30:04 PST