Re: [AMBER] MMPBSA Electrostatic energy

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:12 -0500

Not to completely cancel, but many of the interactions present in the bound
complex are also present in the unbound receptor and ligand. It should
differ *only* in the receptor<->ligand and non-pairwise-additive
interactions (i.e., the solvation term).

HTH,
Jason

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Asma Abro 28-FBAS/MSBI/F09 <
asma.msbi28.iiu.edu.pk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is it normal if after MMPB/GBSA calculation, electrostatic energy (EEL)
> contribution is cancelled out between ligand, receptor and complex? (same
> as internal energy is cancelled)
>
> Best regards,
> Asma
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Nov 11 2015 - 09:00:04 PST
Custom Search