Dear Ross,
Thank you very much. Since superclocked GPUs were not recommended before,
it seems that this problem has been already solved. If this is true then
nothing is mentioned in the website.
Regards,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi M.,
>
> It will probably work fine - although you should test it. I wouldn't trust
> that ACX cooling system much - will create a ton of turbulence - sometimes
> I wonder if the people designing these have ever heard of aerodynamics. So
> You may have issues with the card in the long run - although you may not.
>
> Try the following validation suite - set the GPUS to 1 in the top of the
> script - run it for 40+ tests and see if the log file you get contains
> always the same number. Will take around 24 hours to run. If it doesn't
> then return the card as faulty.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/708185/GPU_Validation_Test.tar.gz
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
> > On Jul 25, 2015, at 4:48 AM, M. Reza Ganjalikhany <
> ganjalikhany.gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Amber Developers,
> >
> > I assembled my own PC based on the recommended hardware from your
> website.
> > Unfortunetely the GPU card that I ordered was not exactly what I recieved
> > today (as you recomended). In fact it is EVGA GTX 980 SC ACX insted. Does
> > the superclocked (SC) or ACX (cooling system) make it different from what
> > you suggested as trusted hardware? Should I send it back to seller? Or
> > should I test it before return?
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > M.Reza
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Jul 25 2015 - 09:00:02 PDT
