[AMBER] WARNING: SGFT, instead of TEMPSG, should be set for SGMDfp/SGLDfp!

From: barbara rossi <chivieneechiva.hotmail.it>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:22:22 +0200

Goodmorning,

I am running self-guided langevin dynamics with Amber12 to enhance conformational sampling and I decided to try the force-momentum based algorithm
with
isgld=2

The output contains the following warning:

Guiding range from 1 TO 762
Local averaging time: 0.2000 ps
Guiding temperature: 380.00 K
*** WARNING: SGFT, instead of TEMPSG, should be set for SGMDfp/SGLDfp!
TEMPSG defines a seaching ability comparable to a simulation at temperature TEMPSG


My question is: is the SGLDfp algorithm not working properly by specifying tempsg rather than sgft?
Is it true also with isgld=2 that "TEMPSG defines a seaching ability comparable to a simulation at temperature TEMPSG" or should I not trust the results from a simulation isgld=2 without specifying SGFT?

thanks in advance for any hints,

Barbara Rossi
University of Liege
Belgium
  
                                               
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 27 2015 - 06:30:03 PDT
Custom Search