Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Questeion: I am not sure how to go about to find the number of bridging
> from this info. Appreciate if I get some hint from here.
The total number of bridging waters is in 'nhb.dat'. If you mean you
need the total number of bridging waters per unique bridge this
information is not stored.
> #Q(2)
> This question is related to the HB lifetime calculation. I came to know
> that the HB lifetimes can be calculated based on 4 types of definitions. i)
> continues lifetime, ii) intermittent lifetime, iii) kinetic lifetime, and
> iv) SSP (stable state picture model) - reference [ Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin.
> 2011, 27 (11), 2547-2552 ]. Since I am writing a paper now, I need the
> citation of on which the AMBER is used to calculate the hydrogen bonding
> lifetimes. I have scanned through the AMBER manual (by typing word
> "lifetime"), but could not find any related citation. Appreciate if you
> could point one.
CPPTRAJ has it's own definition of "lifetime" (which was originally
implemented in PTRAJ's 'hbond' command) which is described in the
manual (Amber 14 section 28.12.11), so just cite the PTRAJ/CPPTRAJ
paper:
Daniel R. Roe and Thomas E. Cheatham, III, "PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ:
Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory
Data". J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2013, 9 (7), pp 3084-3095.
-Dan
>
> Many thanks in advance.
> Regards
> Vijay
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Relating to hydrogen bonding calculations, now I would like to calculate
>> > the values for *water bridging*.
>> >
>> > Could you kindly brief me on how to calculate the number of bridging
>> water
>> > from the HB calculation that I already done as indicated earlier mail in
>> > this post?
>>
>> If you specified 'solventdonor' or 'solventacceptor' then the bridging
>> calculation is performed. It is written the file specified by
>> bridgeout, or solvout, or avgout (in order of precedence). If none of
>> that is specified it is written to STDOUT. See the manual for more
>> details.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Vijay
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear Daniel,
>> >>
>> >> If you dont mind, could you provide the citation relevent for the
>> >> implementation of HB lifetime calcultion?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance.
>> >>
>> >> Vijay
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Dear Daniel,
>> >>>
>> >>> I was away and now I am back.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for your reply.
>> >>>
>> >>> Since I am working on disaccharide glycolipids, I have 11 acceptors
>> >>> (O11,O12,O13,O14,O15,O16,O22,O23,O24,O25,O26), and 7 hydroxyl groups
>> >>> (O12-H12, O13-H13, O16-H16, O22-H22, O23-H23, O24-H24, O26-H26).
>> >>>
>> >>> My main target was to know, in average, how long each acceptor (O) of a
>> >>> glycolipid involve in hydrogen bonding interaction no matter which
>> donor is
>> >>> involved, in the glycolipid bilayer assembly.
>> >>>
>> >>> So to achieve this, I selected columns only with "O22" (for example:
>> >>> BMR_42.O22-BMR, BMR_49.O22-BMR, BMR_59.O22-BMR, BMR_23.O22-BMR,
>> >>> BMR_10.O22-BMR BMR_61.O22-BMR) and sum up all the "1s" and divided
>> with
>> >>> the total number of frames involved. I repeated this procedure for each
>> >>> acceptors.
>> >>>
>> >>> If I am not mistaken, I guess what you have suggested is what I want
>> >>> actually. But I did not use *readdata* and *lifeltime* commands to get
>> >>> the final value. I used an awk script to do the selections column wise
>> and
>> >>> average over all frames.
>> >>>
>> >>> Welcome any feedback from your side to enhance my understanding.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you.
>> >>> Vijay
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You still haven't said whether I was right or wrong about you wanting
>> >>>> to calculate the lifetime of a certain solute atom (or residue) being
>> >>>> involved in *any* hydrogen bond. Since you haven't said no, I will
>> >>>> proceed on the assumption that this is what you want. In that case
>> >>>> this is the procedure I would use.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) Calculate the hydrogen bond time series data (you have done this).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2) Use a script to sum up all columns involving your atom/residue of
>> >>>> interest. This could be as simple as visually identifying which
>> >>>> columns contain the data you need (e.g. columns 2, 4, 5, and 7) and
>> >>>> using something like awk:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> awk '{print $2 + $4 + $5 + $7}' solutehb.dat > sum.dat
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 3) Read the summed data back into cpptraj with readdata:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> readdata sum.dat
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 4) Perform lifetime analysis on the summed data. The default settings
>> >>>> for cutoff etc will still work since anything greater than 0 means a
>> >>>> hydrogen bond is present:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> lifetime sum.dat out life.sum.dat ...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Dan
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Dear Dan,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Below is the example you gave to explain on how the calculation of
>> HB
>> >>>> can
>> >>>> > done with raw data.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > HB1-1 HB1-2
>> >>>> > 1 0
>> >>>> > 0 1
>> >>>> > 1 0
>> >>>> > 1 1
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Using the method I illustrated before you'd come up with an average
>> of
>> >>>> > (5 / 4 = 1.25). However, the actual answer of how often is HB1
>> >>>> > involved in a hydrogen bond is clearly all 4 frames, since when
>> HB1-1
>> >>>> > is broken, HB1-2 is formed, so its always involved in some kind of
>> >>>> > hydrogen bond. So to do what you want you will need to write out the
>> >>>> > raw time series data, sum up the columns corresponding to the
>> hydrogen
>> >>>> > bonds you are interested in, then run 'lifetime' analysis on that
>> data
>> >>>> > set. So using the above sets as an example, the set I would actually
>> >>>> > run lifetime analysis on would look like:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Relating to the above example, I understand that we need to add the
>> >>>> "1"s
>> >>>> > and divide by total number of lines.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > (total of all "1"s) / (total rows with "1"s)
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > So how with the example below? (I modified the above sample).
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > HB1-1 HB1-2
>> >>>> > 1 0
>> >>>> > 0 1
>> >>>> > 1 0
>> >>>> > 1 1
>> >>>> > 0 1
>> >>>> > 0 0
>> >>>> > 0 0
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > For the above example is the the average is 6/7 or 6/5. The
>> number 7
>> >>>> > stand for total number of rows and the later stand for rows with the
>> >>>> > presence of "1" (at least once).
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Means do I need to count the total rows or the rows with the
>> >>>> occurrence of
>> >>>> > "1" only?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Your explanation would help me to write the script.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thanks.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Achari <glycoamber.gmail.com
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >> Dear Dan,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Following your explanation, I would like to verify few things.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> #1) The file that contains the raw data; is this one "solutehb.dat"
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> if yes,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> #2) The format of the data in the file is as below?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> #Frame *BMR_42.O22-BMR_1.O23-H23* BMR_49.O13-BMR_1.O13-H13
>> >>>> >> BMR_59.O13-BMR_2.O22-H22 BMR_10.O13-BMR_2.O26-H26 BMR_61.O26-BMR_3
>> >>>> .O22-H22
>> >>>> >> BMR_23.
>> >>>> >> O25-BMR_4.O12-H12 BMR_23.O26-BMR_4.O13-H13 BMR_23.O25-BMR_4
>> .O13-H13
>> >>>> >> BMR_20.O13-BMR_5.O22-H22 BMR_10.O24-BMR_6.O13-H13 BMR_41.O23-BMR_7
>> >>>> .O23-H2
>> >>>> >> 3 BMR_41.O24-BMR_7.O23-H23 ....
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> * 1 * 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1
>> >>>> >> 1 1 1 . . .
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> #3) So need I operate on this file?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> #4) Is the first data "BMR_42.O22-BMR_1.O23-H23" is corresponding
>> to
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> >> value "1" (below #2)
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Thank you.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Daniel Roe <
>> daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Sorry, it's not clear to me what you're trying to calculate. You
>> said
>> >>>> >>> "I want to know the lifetime of HB for O22 (ACCEPTOR) atom only";
>> do
>> >>>> >>> you want the average lifetime of any given O22 involved in a
>> hydrogen
>> >>>> >>> bond? In that case you will probably need to write your own script
>> >>>> for
>> >>>> >>> it for the time being. I'll try to illustrate why with an example.
>> >>>> Say
>> >>>> >>> I want to ask how often is BMR_49.O22 involved in any hydrogen
>> bond
>> >>>> as
>> >>>> >>> an acceptor. I could naively sum up the total number of frames the
>> >>>> >>> bond is present (TotFrames) for each instance of this acceptor
>> atom
>> >>>> >>> and then divide by the total number of lifetimes:
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> 4 20 5 1.8500 37
>> >>>> >>> BMR_49.O22-BMR_1.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> 7 28 2 1.0357 29
>> >>>> >>> BMR_49.O22-BMR_1.O13-H13
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> the total number frames there is a hydrogen bond is 66, and the
>> total
>> >>>> >>> number of lifetimes is 48, so the average lifetime for BMR_49.O22
>> >>>> >>> involved in any hydrogen bond (given the data here) is 1.375
>> frames.
>> >>>> >>> However, this is only true if the data were sequential, because it
>> >>>> >>> doesn't take into account the times when one is present and the
>> other
>> >>>> >>> isn't. For example, given this hydrogen bond data (where HB1
>> >>>> >>> represents a single acceptor):
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> HB1-1 HB1-2
>> >>>> >>> 1 0
>> >>>> >>> 0 1
>> >>>> >>> 1 0
>> >>>> >>> 1 1
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Using the method I illustrated before you'd come up with an
>> average
>> >>>> of
>> >>>> >>> (5 / 4 = 1.25). However, the actual answer of how often is HB1
>> >>>> >>> involved in a hydrogen bond is clearly all 4 frames, since when
>> HB1-1
>> >>>> >>> is broken, HB1-2 is formed, so its always involved in some kind of
>> >>>> >>> hydrogen bond. So to do what you want you will need to write out
>> the
>> >>>> >>> raw time series data, sum up the columns corresponding to the
>> >>>> hydrogen
>> >>>> >>> bonds you are interested in, then run 'lifetime' analysis on that
>> >>>> data
>> >>>> >>> set. So using the above sets as an example, the set I would
>> actually
>> >>>> >>> run lifetime analysis on would look like:
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> (HB1-1)+(HB1-2)
>> >>>> >>> 1
>> >>>> >>> 1
>> >>>> >>> 1
>> >>>> >>> 2
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Hope this helps,
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> -Dan
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Vijay Achari <
>> glycoamber.gmail.com
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> > Dear Dan,
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > In my case the time gap in between two frames (taken for
>> analysis)
>> >>>> is
>> >>>> >>> 5ps.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > #Set Nlifetimes MaxLT AvgLT TotFrames
>> SetName
>> >>>> >>> > 0 17 215 55.7059
>> 947
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_42.O22-BMR_1.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 1 1 1 1.0000
>> 1
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_42.O23-BMR_1.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 2 31 3 1.0968
>> 34
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_31.O22-BMR_1.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 3 11 2 1.0909
>> 12
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_31.O13-BMR_1.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 4 20 5 1.8500
>> 37
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_49.O22-BMR_1.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 5 24 4 1.7917
>> 43
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_49.O23-BMR_1.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 6 41 2 1.0488
>> 43
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_49.O12-BMR_1.O12-H12
>> >>>> >>> > 7 28 2 1.0357
>> 29
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_49.O22-BMR_1.O13-H13
>> >>>> >>> > 8 1 1000 1000.0000 1000
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_49.O13-BMR_1.O13-H13
>> >>>> >>> > 9 1 1 1.0000
>> 1
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_22.O12-BMR_2.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> > 10 50 62 18.9400
>> 947
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O13-BMR_2.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> > 11 1 1 1.0000
>> 1
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O25-BMR_2.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 12 34 5 1.1471
>> 39
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O13-BMR_2.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 13 7 6 2.1429
>> 15
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O26-BMR_2.O24-H24
>> >>>> >>> > 14 6 8 3.6667
>> 22
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O25-BMR_2.O24-H24
>> >>>> >>> > 15 28 2 1.1071
>> 31
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_10.O26-BMR_2.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 16 52 121 15.1346 787
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_10.O25-BMR_2.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 17 65 9 1.9231
>> 125
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_10.O13-BMR_2.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 18 4 4 2.2500
>> 9
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_59.O26-BMR_2.O26-H26
>> >>>> >>> > 19 9 1 1.0000
>> 9
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_22.O15-BMR_2.O13-H13
>> >>>> >>> > 20 1 1 1.0000
>> 1
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_10.O11-BMR_2.O16-H16
>> >>>> >>> > 21 7 2 1.1429
>> 8
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_53.O13-BMR_2.O16-H16
>> >>>> >>> > 22 2 3 2.5000
>> 5
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_33.O13-BMR_3.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> > 23 97 54 6.8247 662
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_61.O26-BMR_3.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> > 24 1 1 1.0000
>> 1
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_29.O26-BMR_3.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 25 31 36 3.3226 103
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_29.O16-BMR_3.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 26 22 2 1.2273
>> 27
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_30.O22-BMR_3.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 27 4 1 1.0000
>> 4
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_33.O22-BMR_3.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > 28 38 2 1.1316
>> 43
>> >>>> >>> > BMR_33.O13-BMR_3.O23-H23
>> >>>> >>> > (there are more than 2000 lines, but I work on only 28 lines to
>> >>>> get some
>> >>>> >>> > understanding)
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > For clarity, I shall show you how I worked on the given results
>> >>>> above.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > I want to know the lifetime of HB for O22 (ACCEPTOR) atom only.
>> >>>> So, I
>> >>>> >>> did
>> >>>> >>> > in this way,
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > 1) sum the values from column AvgLT for the only occurrences of
>> >>>> O22.
>> >>>> >>> > 2) than find the average of that, where the denominator would be
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> >>> number
>> >>>> >>> > of occurrences of O22.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > Based on the above steps, the results are :
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > O22 occur 6 times,
>> >>>> >>> > sum of O22 is 61.916, and
>> >>>> >>> > average of O22 is 10.319.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > So, I figured out the lifetime of O22 would be 10.319 x 5ps =
>> >>>> 51.595
>> >>>> >>> ps.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > Is this correct? Did I choose the correct column "AvgLT"?
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > I hope to get some feedback if this is correct way to do it.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > Many thanks in advance.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > Vijay
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Roe <
>> >>>> daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Vijay Achari <
>> >>>> glycoamber.gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >> > Could you explain on how to get the lifetime value in pico
>> >>>> second
>> >>>> >>> (ps)?
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> This depends on how often you recorded your coordinate
>> >>>> trajectory. For
>> >>>> >>> >> example, say you ran a simulation with a timestep of 2 fs
>> >>>> (dt=0.002
>> >>>> >>> >> ps) and you recorded a trajectory frame every 500 steps
>> >>>> (ntwx=500).
>> >>>> >>> >> This means that each frame in your trajectory has been recorded
>> >>>> at 1
>> >>>> >>> >> ps intervals. However, say you recorded your trajectory every
>> 5000
>> >>>> >>> >> steps instead - your trajectory then will have been recorded at
>> >>>> 10 ps
>> >>>> >>> >> intervals. Since lifetimes are always given in frames, it
>> should
>> >>>> be
>> >>>> >>> >> easy to convert to ps based on how often your coordinate
>> >>>> trajectory
>> >>>> >>> >> was written to (e.g. in the latter case a max lifetime of 1
>> frame
>> >>>> >>> >> would mean 10 ps).
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> Hope this helps,
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> -Dan
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> > Thanks in advance.
>> >>>> >>> >> > Vijay
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Roe <
>> >>>> daniel.r.roe.gmail.com
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Hi,
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Vijay Achari <
>> >>>> glycoamber.gmail.com
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > generate two files with lifetime information. The
>> >>>> >>> >> *solute.lifetime.dat*
>> >>>> >>> >> >> contain
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > info like:
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > #Set Nlifetimes MaxLT AvgLT TotFrames
>> >>>> SetName
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 0 22 1 1.0000
>> >>>> 22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_3.O16-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 1 296 346 15.6959
>> 4646
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_42.O22-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 2 992 12 1.4688
>> >>>> 1457
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_42.O14-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 3 1 1 1.0000
>> >>>> 1
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_42.O13-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 4 189 12 1.1429
>> >>>> 216
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_57.O25-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > 5 462 410 12.3074
>> 5686
>> >>>> >>> >> >> BMR_57.O16-BMR_1.O22-H22
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > I would like to know how I can go from here to calculate
>> the
>> >>>> >>> >> hb-lifetime
>> >>>> >>> >> >> between
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > solute and solute?
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> I'm not really sure I understand your question. The data
>> >>>> output you
>> >>>> >>> >> >> posted is exactly the lifetime calculation. For example, the
>> >>>> second
>> >>>> >>> >> >> set (1) contains lifetime information for the hydrogen bond
>> >>>> between
>> >>>> >>> >> >> residue 42, atom O22 and residue 1, atoms O22-H22; there
>> were
>> >>>> 296
>> >>>> >>> >> >> individual lifetimes (i.e. the hbond formed 296 times), the
>> >>>> max of
>> >>>> >>> >> >> which lasted 346 frames, the average lifetime is ~15.7
>> frames.
>> >>>> Let
>> >>>> >>> me
>> >>>> >>> >> >> know if I'm not understanding you or if I can explain more.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> -Dan
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > I have read the pages 556-557 from AMBER 14 manual, but I
>> >>>> find it
>> >>>> >>> >> >> difficult
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > to see how one should start processing and getting the
>> >>>> lifetime
>> >>>> >>> value.
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > I think simple example would help me much in this case.
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > Could you give me some example on how this can be
>> obtained?
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > Your help is much appreciated.
>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > Thank you.
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > Vijay
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> >> >> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>>> >>> >> >> -------------------------
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>> >>>> >>> >> >> University of Utah
>> >>>> >>> >> >> 30 South 2000 East, Room 307
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>> >>>> >>> >> >> http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>> >>>> >>> >> >> (801) 587-9652
>> >>>> >>> >> >> (801) 585-6208 (Fax)
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> >> >> AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> >> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> >> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> >> > AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> >> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> >> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> --
>> >>>> >>> >> -------------------------
>> >>>> >>> >> Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>> >>>> >>> >> Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>> >>>> >>> >> University of Utah
>> >>>> >>> >> 30 South 2000 East, Room 307
>> >>>> >>> >> Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>> >>>> >>> >> http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>> >>>> >>> >> (801) 587-9652
>> >>>> >>> >> (801) 585-6208 (Fax)
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> >> AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> > AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> --
>> >>>> >>> -------------------------
>> >>>> >>> Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>> >>>> >>> Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>> >>>> >>> University of Utah
>> >>>> >>> 30 South 2000 East, Room 307
>> >>>> >>> Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>> >>>> >>> http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>> >>>> >>> (801) 587-9652
>> >>>> >>> (801) 585-6208 (Fax)
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> >>> AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> >>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> >>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>> > AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> -------------------------
>> >>>> Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>> >>>> Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>> >>>> University of Utah
>> >>>> 30 South 2000 East, Room 307
>> >>>> Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>> >>>> http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>> >>>> (801) 587-9652
>> >>>> (801) 585-6208 (Fax)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> AMBER mailing list
>> >>>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AMBER mailing list
>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------
>> Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>> Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>> University of Utah
>> 30 South 2000 East, Room 307
>> Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>> http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>> (801) 587-9652
>> (801) 585-6208 (Fax)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
--
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 307
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-6208 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Apr 17 2015 - 07:30:03 PDT
