If I do a grep -r '>&' . I find 34 occurrences. About 15 are test cases in examples/ which use either '>&' or '>&!'.
The 20 or so in the code appear all to be in the form '> log 2 >& log'. I'm not sure what this actually means or why this works with bash but I guess the intention here is to really use '2>&1'.
Cheers,
Hannes.
________________________________________
From: David A Case [case.biomaps.rutgers.edu]
Sent: 23 March 2015 18:50
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Error message from FEW in Amber14 tutorial A24
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> >
> > Yes, >& is bash only (and csh, I think, but it's not POSIX sh). A
> > quick grep reveals a large number of >& used in FEW, all of which
> > will need to be changed to play nicely with Linux distros that use
> > dash.
But can't you use "2>&1" for both bash and sh/dash? Maybe a simple search and
replace will work(?)
....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Mar 23 2015 - 12:30:03 PDT
