Re: [AMBER] unexpected behaviour with antechamber

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:54:25 -0500

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
>
> When I use am1bcc to compute the BCC from an AC file with Mulliken
> charges I will get non-equivalenced charges. I thought that I could
> get these when I run antechamber with the -eq switch but this doesn't
> do it. From a quick look through the source code is seems that the
> corresponding code (through a call to identify_equatom) is only
> triggered when -c is either bcc or resp.

I can very well believe that this is true. I'll file this as a
bug-fix/feature enhancement. Thanks for the report.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 11 2015 - 05:00:03 PST
Custom Search