Re: [AMBER] unexpected behaviour with antechamber

From: Hannes Loeffler <Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:24:30 +0000

On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:46:58 -0500
David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> >
> > the invocation of antechamber below gives a somehwat unexpected
> > result. I would have expected that sqm would get the coordinates
> > from min.rst7 but instead gets those from ac.mol2. final.mol2 will
> > have the coordinates from the restart file as expected.
>
> I agree with your expectation. Try the patch in the attached file
> (untested!) to see if that helps. (Basically, I just moved the
> additional file operations before the charge calculation, rather than
> after it. At least, that's what I tried to do....)

Many thanks. Looks like this is working.


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Feb 10 2015 - 01:30:03 PST
Custom Search