Hi Ryan,
Yes - please see update.9 and the following updated documentation: http://ambermd.org/MICv2_Amber14.pdf
http://ambermd.org/bugfixes14.html
All the best
Ross
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 3:48 PM, Novosielski, Ryan <novosirj.ca.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> Has there been any update on Xeon Phi support in Amber? I have read the section of the manual that explains how it is configured, and the mention of adding support on the website. But that same section mentions that benchmarks are forthcoming. I'm wondering if anyone has a rough idea of how they compare in performance to the other stuff that is out there (Kepler, CPU, etc.).
>
> ____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
> || \\UTGERS |---------------------*O*---------------------
> ||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
> || \\ and Health | novosirj.rutgers.edu<mailto:novosirj.rutgers.edu>- 973/972.0922 (2x0922)
> || \\ Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark
> `'
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 04 2015 - 17:00:02 PST
