On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Paul Mortenson <Paul.Mortenson.astx.com>
wrote:
> Shouldn't that be 0.05ps/frame? Or have I not had enough coffee yet....
>
​haha, perhaps I should start drinking coffee. Yes, 0.05 ps/frame, thanks
for the correction. I read one too few zeros in 60 000 (I'm also not used
to seeing a print frequency more than 0.5 - 2 frames printed per
picosecond...)
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jan 21 2015 - 06:30:03 PST
