Re: [AMBER] Forcefield_PTM

From: Sourav Purohit <sour000.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:05:31 +0530

Thanks

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Ying-Chieh Sun <sun.ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:

> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible
> for Automatic Cleanup! (sun.ntnu.edu.tw) Add cleanup rule
> <https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Ftoken%3D2X%252FbQIrgtvMGFc02N0zwJiwi2whhW0o69HpSH4Iqs2R9N%252FnT0uUptAUxhODoi3zqA4qfpNV3xn8C4hyuXZ8X5WaEw2%252FE7HN5zDQ%252FD3lgjfuaVf7jDA4n%252BAeQPTbvLmhAKompOOpb6BU%253D%26key%3DhtSvZqds38MGSG1CoFc%252F0ewqiwX7G6VLS9AKhbdNMU8%253D&tc_serial=18921864084&tc_rand=104743782&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
> | More info
> <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=18921864084&tc_rand=104743782&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
>
> Based on what I read and the 1st sentence of the forcefield_PTM paper " In
> this work, we introduce Forcefield_PTM, a set of AMBER forcefield
> parameters
> consistent with ff03 for 32 common post-translational modifications. ..."
>
> Yes, I would say that is the best way in handling that.
>
> HTH.
>
> Ying-chieh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sourav Purohit [mailto:sour000.gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:22 AM
> To: AMBER Mailing List
> Subject: [AMBER] Forcefield_PTM
>
> Can forcefield_PTM be used only with ff03??
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Oct 13 2014 - 03:00:02 PDT