Based on what I read and the 1st sentence of the forcefield_PTM paper " In
this work, we introduce Forcefield_PTM, a set of AMBER forcefield parameters
consistent with ff03 for 32 common post-translational modifications. ..."
Yes, I would say that is the best way in handling that.
HTH.
Ying-chieh
-----Original Message-----
From: Sourav Purohit [mailto:sour000.gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:22 AM
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: [AMBER] Forcefield_PTM
Can forcefield_PTM be used only with ff03??
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Oct 12 2014 - 20:30:03 PDT