Re: [AMBER] AMBER Digest, Vol 855, Issue 1

From: Duggan, Brendan <bmduggan.ucsd.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 19:18:17 +0000

Hi Dan

Here is the statement I used in cpptraj to measure the torsion angle

dihedral H18-H17 .H18 .C18 .C17 .H17 out palmyrolide-1.0.rmd.dihedral

Looking at the structure in chimera the angle between those atoms certainly appears to be close to 180o, and when I measure it chimera reports the same values as cpptraj.



Hi,

What is the exact input you are giving to cpptraj? Are you sure you
are using the exact same atoms in cpptraj and in the restraint
definition?

-Dan

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Duggan, Brendan <bmduggan.ucsd.edu> wrote:
> I have been using NMR-derived restraints in a simulated annealing protocol to refine the structure of a non-peptidic small molecule. Distance restraints have been working fine, but the torsion restraints have not. In the sander output the torsion restraint is often reported as violated with a value that does not match what I measure with cpptraj.
>
> My molecule has a carbon-carbon double bond in a trans configuration and I have been trying to restrain the torsion between the protons on either side to ~180o. The restraint I am using is
>
> # 1 PAL H18 1 PAL C18 1 PAL C17 1 PAL H17 160 170 190 200
> &rst
> iat = 53, 3, 4, 34,
> r1 = 160.0, r2 = 170.0, r3 = 190.0, r4 = 200.0,
> rk2 = 2.0, rk3 = 2.0,
> &end
>
> To test the torsion restraint I ran several one step MD runs with just one restraint, the torsion restraint above.
> In the starting co-ordinates the value of this torsion as measured by cpptraj was -179.8360o . After a one step MD run the sander output reports the restraint as violated.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> First atom Last atom curr. value target deviation penalty
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> C18 PLM 1 -- C17 PLM 1: 315.813 190.000 125.813 1.472 t
> Total torsion penalty: 1.472
>
> Using cpptraj to measure the torsion after the one step MD gives a value of 179.9927o.
>
> I see the same behaviour with Amber 11, 12 and 14. Have I defined the restraint incorrectly?
>
> Brendan M. Duggan, PhD
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu May 15 2014 - 12:30:05 PDT
Custom Search