Re: [AMBER] Analysis of minimization stage

From: Valentina Romano <valentina.romano.unibas.ch>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 11:53:26 +0000

Yep.

I didi it. And this is the result:

CPPTRAJ: Trajectory Analysis. V13.22
    ___ ___ ___ ___
     | \/ | \/ | \/ |
    _|_/\_|_/\_|_/\_|_
        AmberParm Title: [default_name]
        Radius Set: modified Bondi radii (mbondi)
INPUT: Reading Input from file PknGAde-wt-min.check_overlap
  [trajin PknGAde-wt-min.rst]
        [PknGAde-wt-min.rst] contains 1 frames.
  [checkoverlap]
    CHECKSTRUCTURE: Checking atoms in mask [*].
        Checking inter-atom and bond distances.
        Warnings will be printed for bond lengths > eq + 1.15 Ang
        and non-bond distances < 0.80 Ang.
  [go]

PARAMETER FILES:
 0: PknGHAdeH_ion_wt.prmtop, 28424 atoms, 8443 res, box: Orthogonal, 8198 mol, 8190 solvent, 1 frames

INPUT TRAJECTORIES:
 0: [PknGAde-wt-min.rst] is an AMBER restart file, no velocities, Parm PknGHAdeH_ion_wt.prmtop (Orthogonal box) (reading 1 of 1)
  Coordinate processing will occur on 1 frames.

REFERENCE COORDS:
  No frames defined.

OUTPUT TRAJECTORIES:
  No files.

BEGIN TRAJECTORY PROCESSING:
.....................................................
ACTION SETUP FOR PARM [PknGHAdeH_ion_wt.prmtop] (1 actions):
  0: [checkoverlap]
    CHECKSTRUCTURE: * (28424 atoms, 28459 bonds), imaging on.
----- [PknGAde-wt-min.rst] (1-1, 1) -----
100% Complete.

Read 1 frames and processed 1 frames.

ACTION OUTPUT:

DATASETS:
  No data sets.

Thus apparently there are no clashes in the minimizaed structure.

If both energy and overlaps are fine in my starting structure, how can i understand why the MD is not working properly?

Any idea?

Vale

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Valentina Romano | PhD Student | Biozentrum, University of Basel & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Klingelbergstrasse 61 | CH-4056 Basel |

Phone: +41 61 267 15 80


________________________________________
From: David A Case [case.biomaps.rutgers.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 1:47 PM
To: AMBER Mailing List
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Analysis of minimization stage

On Mon, May 12, 2014, Valentina Romano wrote:

> I would like the use cheackoverlap in cptraj but is not really clear how
> it works.

We probably don't emphasize enough the help facility in cpptraj, e.g.:
in cpptraj, typing "help checkoverlap" will give you usage. In this case
is quite simple:

parm <parmtop-file>
trajin <restart file from minimization>
checkoverlap
go

Hope this helps....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 12 2014 - 05:00:05 PDT
Custom Search