Re: [AMBER] generating topology

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:22:47 -0700

The msg below helps you decide whether the explicit IMPROPER section in
the old prepin file matches the impropers found by matching atom types.
It was used when developing the new method (now old).

Bill

David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014, Vijay Manickam Achari wrote:
> >
> > At the point it finishes I get some messages related to improper torsion
> > angles. The message is as below:
> >
> > old PREP-specified impropers:
> >  <TR0 1>:  CA   OXT  C    O   
> >  <TR0 1>:  CB   CD2  CG   CD1 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CG   HD1  CD1  NE1 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CE2  CD1  NE1  HE1 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CD2  CZ2  CE2  NE1 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CE2  CE3  CD2  CG  
> >  <TR0 1>:  CD2  CZ3  CE3  HE3 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CE3  CH2  CZ3  HZ3 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CZ3  CZ2  CH2  HH2 
> >  <TR0 1>:  CE2  CH2  CZ2  HZ2 
> >  total 10 improper torsions applied
> >  10 improper torsions in old prep form
>
> These are not errors, just information that you don't reall need to have.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Mar 19 2014 - 19:30:09 PDT
Custom Search