Re: [AMBER] Does chain type matter?

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:42:26 -0800

If you don't know what a chain type is, you can't be affected by them.
It's a legacy thing.

Bill

David Winogradoff <dwino218.gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear amber community,
>
> I am acetylating a lysine in my PDB using xLeap by adding an "ACE." When I
> finish editing the file and execute "saveamberparm," xLeap creates the
> .prmtop and .inpcrd files but provides the following message:
>
> Building Topology
> .
> . #normal messages
> .
> Building H-Bond parameters
> Not Marking per-residue atom chain types.
> Marking per-residue atom chain types.
> (Residues lacking connect0/connect1 -
> these don't have chain types marked:
>
> res total affected
>
> ACE 1
> CGLN 1
> NSER 1
> )
> (no restraints).
>
> It looks to me like amber doesn't like something about the residues at the
> 2 termini (SER and GLN) and the acetyl group that I have added, ACE.
>
> Will this have an effect on dynamics? Or is this a message I can safely
> ignore?
>
> Thank you,
> David Winogradoff
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Research Assistant
> Chemical Physics
> University of Maryland
> College Park
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Feb 11 2014 - 22:00:02 PST
Custom Search