Re: [AMBER] CL vs Cl & more...

From: case <>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:10:05 -0500

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013, FyD wrote:
> then why defining 'FE' and ... 'Zn' as atom types... where is the rational?

Rationale? We don't need no stinking rationale....

(more) seriously: just historical artifacts. Those atom types should really
not be there at all; rather they "should" be in problem-specific frcmod files.


AMBER mailing list
Received on Mon Nov 18 2013 - 04:30:02 PST
Custom Search