Re: [AMBER] AMBER version

From: Mary Varughese <maryvj1985.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:44:59 +0530

Thank you sir.


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:17 PM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013, Mary Varughese wrote:
> >
> > I performed simulation of a complex with three different target( ligand
> > same different nucleic acid sequence). Is there any problem in comparing
> > the three simulations, if two of them are run under amber12 and one under
> > amber11. ?
>
> Unless you are using different options in the three calculations, results
> from
> Amber11 should match those from Amber12. So there should not be problems
> in
> making comparisons.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Sep 23 2013 - 16:30:03 PDT
Custom Search