Re: [AMBER] BOND, ANGLE and TORSION energies discrepancy between amber and gromacs

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:46:51 -0400

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013, Golshan Hejazi wrote:
>
> I computed the BOND and ANGLE energies. But it is only increasing my
> confusion ... Look: I have a simple ace-ala-nme system.

How about going to just ace-nme? It would much easier to compare each
individual term, and you would still have bonds, angles and dihedrals.

While I am thinking about it, be sure that the conversion of the blocking
groups (ace and nme) between Amber and Gromacs is correct (i.e. not just
the amino acids themselves.)

...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Aug 09 2013 - 07:00:04 PDT
Custom Search