Awww, you spoilt it. I was waiting for someone to post that they were
trying to run the JAC benchmark at 200K instead of 300K to see if the
reduction in temperature fixed things. ;-)
On 7/11/13 8:56 PM, "Fenley, Andrew" <afenley.ucsd.edu> wrote:
>Maybe he can just set temp0=333.0 to simulate the additional heat instead
>of using the hair dryerŠ. :-)
>
>On Jul 11, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ET,
>>>
>>> Ok, I am retrying my GTX780 runs with nstlim=1000000 and JAC NPT. 10 x
>>>4
>>> GPU for 40 runs. I'll let you know how it goes. One thing to note
>>>though,
>>> if it is temperature related my box is a rack mount system with
>>> professional front to back cooling, like in the attached flyer, and
>>>NOT a
>>> homebrew desktop so it is very possible that you are seeing problems
>>> because your box cooling is not as good. Pure speculation on my part
>>> though as I don't have any data to back this up.
>>
>> Can you stand behind the computer with an industrial hair dryer to heat
>>it up and stress the system? That should rigorously test your hypothesis
>>and provide all necessary data for a definitive conclusion.
>>
>> Always here to help,
>> Jason
>>
>> --
>> Jason Swails
>> Quantum Theory Project,
>> University of Florida
>> Ph.D. Candidate
>> 352-392-4032
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jul 11 2013 - 21:30:03 PDT
