Should be fixed.
On 6/20/13 1:15 AM, "Vaibhav Dixit" <vaibhavadixit.gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>For some reason I unsubscribed from amber list, then joined again 2 days
>ago.
>But I am not getting the usual subject-wise message from amber rather a
>cumbersome "AMBER Digest, Vol 547, Issue 1" kind of stuff.
>
>I checked in the mail options available, but could not figure out why this
>is happening.
>Please suggest how to receive "subject-wise" Amber list as earlier.
>
>A small portion of this Digest email is given below.
>Thank you.
>
>Send AMBER mailing list submissions to
> amber.ambermd.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> amber-request.ambermd.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> amber-owner.ambermd.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of AMBER digest..."
>
>
>AMBER Mailing List Digest
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Job stops due to INFO: Old style inpcrd file read
> (Jason Swails)
> 2. gaff atom type (inhee park)
> 3. Re: Antechamber atom types and all_nuc94.in atom descriptions
> (Kamali Sripathi)
> 4. problem with tleap (Rejwan)
> 5. Re: problem with tleap (Jason Swails)
> 6. Re: Graphene topology from GAFF (Hector A. Baldoni)
> 7. tleap has error by applying amber ff03ua (Chris Moth)
> 8. Re: Graphene topology from GAFF (Dan Piraner)
> 9. Re: problem with tleap (Rejwan)
> 10. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Sorensen, Jesper)
> 11. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Sorensen, Jesper)
> 12. Re: Antechamber atom types and all_nuc94.in atom
>descriptions
> (FyD)
> 13. Nonbond cells need to be recalculated, restart simulation
> from previous checkpoint with a higher value for skinnb. (???)
> 14. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Jason Swails)
> 15. Re: Nonbond cells need to be recalculated, restart simulation
> from previous checkpoint with a higher value for skinnb.
> (Jason Swails)
> 16. Re: Cellulose NVE with pmemd.cuda.MPI (Ross Walker)
> 17. Re: tleap has error by applying amber ff03ua (David A Case)
> 18. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Hailin Huang)
> 19. Re: A and Z-DNA (Collins Nganou)
> 20. Re: A and Z-DNA (arnab bhattacharya)
> 21. Re: A and Z-DNA (Collins Nganou)
> 22. Re: qmcut in QM/MM simulation with AMBER/GAUSSIAN (Eric Berquist)
> 23. Re: problem with tleap (Rejwan)
> 24. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 25. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 26. Thanks (Hunter Brown)
> 27. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Jonathan Gough)
> 28. Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Fabr?cio Bracht)
> 29. Update 10 for AmberTools 13: CPPTRAJ (Daniel Roe)
> 30. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 31. Re: Cellulose NVE with pmemd.cuda.MPI (Scott Le Grand)
> 32. Re: Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Daniel Roe)
> 33. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 34. Re: ERROR: GPU runs fail with nfft Error only when running 2x
> geforce TITANS in same machine (Scott Le Grand)
> 35. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Scott Le Grand)
> 36. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 37. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 38. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 39. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 40. Re: Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Jason Swails)
> 41. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Hailin Huang)
> 42. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Daniel Roe)
> 43. Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
> calculations ? (Marek Maly)
> 44. Re: Update 10 for AmberTools 13: CPPTRAJ (Jan-Philip Gehrcke)
> 45. Difficulty running sander (Hunter Brown)
> 46. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Robert Konecny)
> 47. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 48. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
> 49. Re: Protein leaving periodic box (Hailin Huang)
> 50. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 51. NAB extract residue from molecule (Le,Huy Tuan)
> 52. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
> calculations ? (Gould, Ian R)
> 53. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
> - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 54. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
> calculations ? (Gould, Ian R)
> 55. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
> calculations ? (Scott Le Grand)
> 56. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Scott Le Grand)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:03:29 -0400
>From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [AMBER] Job stops due to INFO: Old style inpcrd file read
>To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
>Message-ID:
><CAEk9e3q8k_-yHgNo=n9_uxAQKWaYW+x=rG9q6LVU-x+gZ1UpBA.mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Aditya Padhi <adi.uoh.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>> Thanks for the quick reply and the suggestion about the cutoff. But
>>I
>> would like to bring to your attention that I have a simple protein
>> (basically a single protein, not a complex). Although I tried to run the
>> simulation with a higher cut-off as you suggested, the error massage is
>> again the same that I posted in my previous mail and eDo you have
>ventually
>> the job stops. Do you have any comment on this? Shall I modify or do
>>some
>> additional stuffs here?
>--
>With Regards.
>
>Dr. Vaibhav A. Dixit,
>Postdoctoral Reserach Scientist,
>Etherow F40/6,
>AstraZeneca,
>Charter Way,
>Silk Road Business Park,
>Macclesfield,
>Cheshire,
>England,
>SK10 2NX
>Ext. No. 20278
>Moblie Number: +44 (0) 7448233157
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jun 20 2013 - 10:00:02 PDT
