[AMBER] receiving amber digest not separate subject wise as earlier

From: Vaibhav Dixit <vaibhavadixit.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:15:07 +0100

Hi,
For some reason I unsubscribed from amber list, then joined again 2 days
ago.
But I am not getting the usual subject-wise message from amber rather a
cumbersome "AMBER Digest, Vol 547, Issue 1" kind of stuff.

I checked in the mail options available, but could not figure out why this
is happening.
Please suggest how to receive "subject-wise" Amber list as earlier.

A small portion of this Digest email is given below.
Thank you.

Send AMBER mailing list submissions to
        amber.ambermd.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        amber-request.ambermd.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        amber-owner.ambermd.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of AMBER digest..."


AMBER Mailing List Digest

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Job stops due to INFO: Old style inpcrd file read
      (Jason Swails)
   2. gaff atom type (inhee park)
   3. Re: Antechamber atom types and all_nuc94.in atom descriptions
      (Kamali Sripathi)
   4. problem with tleap (Rejwan)
   5. Re: problem with tleap (Jason Swails)
   6. Re: Graphene topology from GAFF (Hector A. Baldoni)
   7. tleap has error by applying amber ff03ua (Chris Moth)
   8. Re: Graphene topology from GAFF (Dan Piraner)
   9. Re: problem with tleap (Rejwan)
  10. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Sorensen, Jesper)
  11. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Sorensen, Jesper)
  12. Re: Antechamber atom types and all_nuc94.in atom descriptions
      (FyD)
  13. Nonbond cells need to be recalculated, restart simulation
      from previous checkpoint with a higher value for skinnb. (???)
  14. Re: MMPBSA.py and cpptraj error (Jason Swails)
  15. Re: Nonbond cells need to be recalculated, restart simulation
      from previous checkpoint with a higher value for skinnb.
      (Jason Swails)
  16. Re: Cellulose NVE with pmemd.cuda.MPI (Ross Walker)
  17. Re: tleap has error by applying amber ff03ua (David A Case)
  18. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Hailin Huang)
  19. Re: A and Z-DNA (Collins Nganou)
  20. Re: A and Z-DNA (arnab bhattacharya)
  21. Re: A and Z-DNA (Collins Nganou)
  22. Re: qmcut in QM/MM simulation with AMBER/GAUSSIAN (Eric Berquist)
  23. Re: problem with tleap (Rejwan)
  24. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  25. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  26. Thanks (Hunter Brown)
  27. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Jonathan Gough)
  28. Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Fabr?cio Bracht)
  29. Update 10 for AmberTools 13: CPPTRAJ (Daniel Roe)
  30. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  31. Re: Cellulose NVE with pmemd.cuda.MPI (Scott Le Grand)
  32. Re: Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Daniel Roe)
  33. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  34. Re: ERROR: GPU runs fail with nfft Error only when running 2x
      geforce TITANS in same machine (Scott Le Grand)
  35. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Scott Le Grand)
  36. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  37. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  38. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  39. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  40. Re: Curious behavior of cpptraj in ambertools 13.1 (Jason Swails)
  41. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Hailin Huang)
  42. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Daniel Roe)
  43. Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
      calculations ? (Marek Maly)
  44. Re: Update 10 for AmberTools 13: CPPTRAJ (Jan-Philip Gehrcke)
  45. Difficulty running sander (Hunter Brown)
  46. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Robert Konecny)
  47. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  48. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Marek Maly)
  49. Re: Protein leaving periodic box (Hailin Huang)
  50. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  51. NAB extract residue from molecule (Le,Huy Tuan)
  52. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
      calculations ? (Gould, Ian R)
  53. Re: experiences with EVGA GTX TITAN Superclocked - memtestG80
      - UNDERclocking in Linux ? (Scott Le Grand)
  54. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
      calculations ? (Gould, Ian R)
  55. Re: Experiences with GTX 780 in the framework of Amber
      calculations ? (Scott Le Grand)
  56. Re: Need a higher value for SKINNB (Scott Le Grand)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:03:29 -0400
From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Job stops due to INFO: Old style inpcrd file read
To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
Message-ID:
<CAEk9e3q8k_-yHgNo=n9_uxAQKWaYW+x=rG9q6LVU-x+gZ1UpBA.mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Aditya Padhi <adi.uoh.gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
> Thanks for the quick reply and the suggestion about the cutoff. But I
> would like to bring to your attention that I have a simple protein
> (basically a single protein, not a complex). Although I tried to run the
> simulation with a higher cut-off as you suggested, the error massage is
> again the same that I posted in my previous mail and eDo you have
ventually
> the job stops. Do you have any comment on this? Shall I modify or do some
> additional stuffs here?
-- 
With Regards.
Dr. Vaibhav A. Dixit,
Postdoctoral Reserach Scientist,
Etherow F40/6,
AstraZeneca,
Charter Way,
Silk Road Business Park,
Macclesfield,
Cheshire,
England,
SK10 2NX
Ext. No. 20278
Moblie Number: +44 (0) 7448233157
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jun 20 2013 - 01:30:03 PDT
Custom Search