Looks like a v small diff. Thanks for that Jan-Phillip.:)
On 2 June 2013 10:58, Jan-Philip Gehrcke <jgehrcke.googlemail.com> wrote:
> A while back, with Amber 11, I made a very small study for quantifying the
> performance difference between GCC 4.6.2 and ICC 12.1.3 for sander(.MPI)
> and pmemd(.MPI) tested with the the JAC production (NPT) benchmark.
> Resulting plot attached.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jan-Philip
>
>
> 02.06.2013 05:47, ET wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies if this question has been asked before, but I could not find an
>> answer when I searched.
>>
>> I wanted to know which compiler gives the best code performance for AMBER
>> 12. I have compiled with both intel C++ & Fortran and GNU.
>>
>> There are less variations in the diff file using Gnu. I assume because the
>> benchmark was run on an installation compiled with GNU?
>>
>> I am specifically interested in CUDA optimisation. Is there any benefit to
>> using compilers from the Portland group?
>>
>> br,
>> g
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/**mailman/listinfo/amber<http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Jun 02 2013 - 03:30:02 PDT
