[AMBER] rmsd vs rmsf

From: <nguyentb.bii.a-star.edu.sg>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:36:08 +0800

Dear Amber user,
After finishing the MD simulation, first I reimaged all the snapshot
in the trajectory:
    trajin md1.mdcrd.gz
    trajin md2.mdcrd.gz
    trajout reimagined.mdcrd.gz
    center :1-393
    image familiar
    go
Then, I calculated the rmsf of the whole protein with the following
ptraj file:
    trajin reimagined.mdcrd.gz 1 2000 1
    reference initial_solvated.inpcrd
    rms reference :1-393
    atomicfluct out RMSF_sidechain.dat
:1-393.CB,CG,CG1,CG2,CD1,CD2,CD,CE1,CE2,CE3,CE,CZ,CZ2,CZ3,OD1,OD2,OE1,OE2,OG,OG1,SG,SD,ND1,ND2,NE1,NE2,NE,NZ
byres
go

Then, I calculated the rmsd of a residue, that I'm interested in, for
example: residue 50, with the following ptraj file:
     trajin reimagined.mdcrd.gz 1 2000 1
     reference initial_solvated.inpcrd
     rms reference out RMSD_50_sidechain.dat
:50.CB,CG,CG1,CG2,CD1,CD2,CD,CE1,CE2,CE3,CE,CZ,CZ2,CZ3,OD1,OD2,OE1,OE2,OG,OG1,SG,SD,ND1,ND2,NE1,NE2,NE,NZ

The rmsd of residue 50 is around 0.1, while the rmsf of residue 50
(calculated above) is 1.
It makes no sense to me. I mean, the average rmsd should be in the
same range with rmsf. Right?
Would you please tell me, which part I did is incorrect?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Binh


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue May 21 2013 - 03:00:02 PDT
Custom Search