Re: [AMBER] RESP charges for iron-sulfur cluster

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:13:31 -0400

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013, safwat abdel-azeim wrote:

>I am calculating RESP charges using Antechamber of iron-sulfur cluster
>complex. I used BS-DFT to optimize the geometry and UHF/6-31G* to
>calculate ESP with the same wave function. But when I used antechamber
>to get RESP charges using the following commands, it gave totally
>different charges, for ex. for Phosphorus it changes from positive to
>negative. I used g03 to generate ESP and Amber12. Can you help me to
>figure out this error. Why when I used Mol2 and PDB output file
>format the results are different.
>
>Case-1- antechamber -i isph_BS2_ESP.log -fi gout -o
>isph_BS2_charges.mol2 -fo mol2 -c resp -nc -3 -m 1 -j 0
>
>Case-2- antechamber -i isph_BS2_ESP.log -fi gout -o
>isph_BS2_charges.pdb -fo pdb -c resp -nc -3 -m 1 -j 0

I am confused here. The pdb output file from antechamber doesn't include
charges. Can you say exactly how you are getting the charges in Case-2?

You should also give information about which version of antechamber you are
using.

...thx..dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Mar 15 2013 - 05:30:03 PDT
Custom Search