Re: [AMBER] GLYCAM_06 & GLYCAM_06h

From: Lachele Foley (Lists) <"Lachele>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:23:33 -0500

Sorry I didn't answer earlier at the other address. Deadlines, plumbing, etc...

There are differences between 06 and 06h. In fact, there is now an
06h-1. The latter might be important if you have a glycan attached to
a protein. To understand the changes, you would need to read the
documentation for all the releases in between. The docs are all here:
  glycam.org/params

If a PDB worked for 06, it should work for 06h.

The changes would be in the force field. In most situations, 06h (and
06h-1) should perform better than earlier versions.



On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Subrata Paul <paul.subrata34.gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear, Sir/Maam
>
> Previously, We are using GLYCAM_06 force field for a carbohydrate with
> AMBER10,
> but Now I want to use AMBER12, which have GLYCAM_06h.
>
> 1. Is there any difference between GLYCAM_06 and GLYCAM_06h?
>
> 2. Can we use that same PDB for carbohydrate with GLYCAM_06h in AMBER12?
>
> 3. Is it make some changes to the molecule?
>
> Wishing you a very Christmas
> Subrata
>
> --
> *With Best Regards
> Subrata
> PhD Student
> Dept of Chemistry.
> IIT G
> *
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber



-- 
:-) Lachele
Lachele Foley
CCRC/UGA
Athens, GA USA
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Dec 26 2012 - 23:30:03 PST
Custom Search