Re: [AMBER] is there a difference between the GTX 680 GPU's

From: Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:44:58 +0100

Thanks Jason !

I was asking because am actually thinking about the purchase of "EVGA
GeForce GTX680 Classified" so
if no personal-experience based warning regarding this card will arrive
here I will buy this
Christmas present.

   Best wishes,

       Marek



Dne Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:35:40 +0100 Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
napsal/-a:

> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> when speaking about the EVGA GTX 680s what is your opinion about this
>> variant:
>>
>> EVGA GeForce GTX680 Classified
>>
>> 1536 CUDA cores
>> 4 GB 256-bit GDDR5
>> Core clock at 1111 MHz
>> Boost Clock at 1176 MHz
>> Effective Memory clock at 6008 MHz
>>
>> Seems to me as the most powerful from the actual 4 GB EVGA GTX 680 cards
>> (and maybe from the all 4 GB GTXs 680 at the moment).
>>
>
> Same comments apply (the diff b/w this card and jonathan's 2nd card is
> about the same as the difference between the two cards he asked about).
> Again, when comparing only memory speeds and processor speeds (all else
> being equal), I only expect memory speeds to matter.
>
> Of course, since each card is >$500 a pop, I'm a graduate student, and
> HPCs
> won't buy consumer gaming cards (and certainly not different models to
> run
> on otherwise identical hardware), this evaluation is based on no
> real-world
> testing whatsoever. This is, therefore, an invitation for anyone that
> knows the real-world answers of these questions to drop a hint ;). (Or
> someone else's hunch/suspicion, of course)
>
> All the best,
> Jason
>


-- 
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Nov 29 2012 - 17:00:02 PST
Custom Search