Re: [AMBER] is AMBER FF good enough for long time scaled MD?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Albert <
mailmd2011.gmail.com
>
Date
: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:39:51 +0100
On 11/21/2012 01:03 PM, francesco oteri wrote:
> What do you mean with "SF degradation"?
> Is there any paper describing such a phenomenon?
>
> Francesco
here is the full text for what I mean, in page 2.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2012/04/11/336.6078.229.DC1/Jensen.SM.pdf
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Wed Nov 21 2012 - 06:00:05 PST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] is AMBER FF good enough for long time scaled MD?"
Previous message
:
Albert: "Re: [AMBER] is AMBER FF good enough for long time scaled MD?"
In reply to
:
francesco oteri: "Re: [AMBER] is AMBER FF good enough for long time scaled MD?"
Next in thread
:
David A Case: "Re: [AMBER] is AMBER FF good enough for long time scaled MD?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search