Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.me.com> wrote:
> One more question out of curiosity. AmberTools 1.5, to my knowledge, was the penultimate version of AmberTools. What prompted the jump of numbering from 1.5 to 12? It's a bit counterintuitive. Or am I mistaken?
The '12' in AmberTools12 is simply because it was released in
conjunction with Amber12.
In my opinion the old numbering scheme was counter-intuitive (e.g.
it's not at all clear that AmberTools 1.2 should be associated with
Amber10, etc). Opinions vary though :-).
-Dan
--
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 201
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-9119 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Aug 24 2012 - 10:00:02 PDT
