That isn't expected.
On Jun 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Brandon Sim" <simpavid.gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Amber users,
>
> Does sander stop equilibration when temp0 is reached, even when the number
> of steps has not gotten to nstlim?
>
> I ran three simulations with nstlim=10000, but all three ended at step
> 3500, resulting in 7 nanoseconds of trajectory and 35 frames (I wrote a
> frame each 100 steps).
>
> The temperature had already gotten to ~300 K , which was my temp0. Is this
> expected behavior, is my script wrong somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jun 29 2012 - 03:00:03 PDT
