Re: [AMBER] why cut off is so small for CUDA running?

From: Martin Andersson <ma.nano.ku.dk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:45:45 +0200

Hi,

These settings with slightly longer cutoff and coarser PME grid would
fit my system very well. Is there a reference for using this
combination, as most recommend a 1Å PME grid spacing?

Martin Andersson
University of Copenhagen

>
> Quite the opposite actually... It is much easier to get efficiency
> and scaling at higher cutoffs. That is why IMO you see them used with
> other codebases. PME can use any cutoff as there is a direct
> relationship between it and the reciprocal sum grid spacing. A 12
> angstrom cutoff corresponds well with a 2 angstrom grid spacing hence
> that's what Anton uses for example.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jun 19 2012 - 05:00:03 PDT
Custom Search