Re: [AMBER] Entropy from MMPBSA.py and MM_PBSA.pl

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:06:44 -0400

What version of MMPBSA.py are you using? If AmberTools 1.5, have you
applied all bug fixes? (Particularly, bugfix.27 and bugfix.28). If you
haven't, you should be able to use the "-rewrite-output" flag to avoid
redoing the calculation.

HTH,
Jason

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Nan Li <nli4.ncsu.edu> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I calculated the entropy for a peptide+watershell system by using both
> MMPBSA.py and MM_PBSA.pl.
>
> Peptide+watershell :complex; peptide :ligand
>
> Results for entropy that I got from these two scripts are different,
> especially for the receptor (watershell) :
>
> MMPBSA.py::
>
> ENTROPY RESULTS (HARMONIC APPROXIMATION) CALCULATED WITH NMODE:
>
> Complex:
>
> Entropy Term Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
> Mean
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translational 15.7572 0.0000
> 0.0000
>
> Rotational 15.4116 0.0127
> 0.0073
>
> Vibrational 1128.9861 13.2411
> 7.6448
>
> Total 1160.1549 13.2525
> 7.6513
>
>
>
> Receptor:
>
> Entropy Term Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
> Mean
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translational 13.7862 0.0000
> 0.0000
>
> Rotational 14.2357 0.1439
> 0.0831
>
> Vibrational 669.3464 47.3527
> 27.3391
>
> Total 697.3683 47.2087
> 27.2559
>
>
>
> Ligand:
>
> Entropy Term Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
> Mean
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translational 15.6553 0.0000
> 0.0000
>
> Rotational 15.2580 0.0166
> 0.0096
>
> Vibrational 732.7309 2.8869
> 1.6667
>
> Total 763.6439 2.9028
> 1.6759
>
>
>
> Differences (Complex - Receptor - Ligand):
>
> Entropy Term Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
> Mean
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translational -13.6842 0.0000
> 0.0000
>
> Rotational -14.0821 0.1415
> 0.0817
>
> Vibrational -273.0911 57.6574
> 33.2885
>
>
>
> DELTA S total= -300.8573 57.5159
> 33.2068
>
>
>
>
>
> MM_PBSA.pl::
>
> # COMPLEX RECEPTOR
> LIGAND
>
>
> # ----------------------- -----------------------
> -----------------------
>
> # MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN
> STD
>
> # ======================= =======================
> =======================
>
> TSTRA 15.85 0.00 13.87 0.00 15.75
> 0.00
>
> TSROT 15.64 0.01 13.83 0.06 15.51
> 0.01
>
> TSVIB 1017.93 14.25 323.39 18.15 757.42
> 2.50
>
> TSTOT 1049.43 14.26 351.10 18.12 788.69
> 2.50
>
>
>
> # DELTA
>
> # -----------------------
>
> # MEAN STD
>
> # =======================
>
> TSTRA -13.77 0.00
>
> TSROT -13.70 0.05
>
> TSVIB -62.88 25.46
>
> TSTOT -90.35 25.42
>
> As shown above, the number for the vibration part of entropy from the
> Python script is twice as that from the perl script.
>
> Has anyone compare the results from these two scripts before? Any comment
> is welcome.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Nan
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jun 07 2012 - 12:30:04 PDT
Custom Search