Dear Francois,
Yes, I want to derive RESP charges and force field for the whole
molecule.  So I followed the manu of antechamber.  What I found is the
charges are weird big.  I do not know the reason.  I am wondering if I
used wrong setting for Gaussian or I misused antechamber.  I hope
somebody can give me some clue for this issue.
I will try to follow RED later.
Thanks,
William
On 4/18/12, FyD <fyd.q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> This is difficult to help as you did not provide a lot information
> about what you did...
>
> I looked at your structure and it looks like a modified amino-acid,
> but not exactly as this is not a dipeptide... Do you want to derive
> RESP charges for this whole molecule? or do you want to derive charges
> for a particular/corresponding fragment? (one could understand errors
> (i. e. the bad charge values you reported) in the fit if the
> constraints defined to design the fragments are not well defined...).
>
> I used R.E.D. Server as defined at:
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/faq.php#3 &
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/faq.php#21
>
> - The Ante_R.E.D. 2.0 job to generate the .P2N file: R.E.D. Server job:
> P7686
> (the atom order has been modofied by Ante_R.E.D.
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFCFjrwFXVADFHRGSLxADFtyG6W2JoWTysLt1/P7686.html
> The corresponding Java applet:
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFCFjrwFXVADFHRGSLxADFtyG6W2JoWTysLt1/P7686/javaappletp2n-1.html
> The corresponding P2N file:
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFCFjrwFXVADFHRGSLxADFtyG6W2JoWTysLt1/P7686/Mol_antered1-out.p2n
>
> - Then, I modified the total charge value of your molecule in the P2N file
> REMARK CHARGE-VALUE 1
>
> - The R.E.D. IV job to generate the .mol2 file: R.E.D. Server job: P7688
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFf2IY3YV7ADFr8OYbP0kodeOQpVkttuADFADFADF/P7688.html
> The corresponding Java applet:
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFf2IY3YV7ADFr8OYbP0kodeOQpVkttuADFADFADF/P7688/javaappletmol2-1.html
> The corresponding mol2 file:
> http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/~ucpublic1/ADF1ADFf2IY3YV7ADFr8OYbP0kodeOQpVkttuADFADFADF/P7688/Data-R.E.D.Server/Mol_m1-o1.mol2
>
> -> the optimized geometry is similar to that you reported in the
> "KP92_Esp_Low.log" MEP file...
>     (you have an intra-molecular hydrogen bond that might not be
> suitable...)
>
> -> As you can see in the .mol2 file (a FF library file format similar
> to the prep one; See
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/Tutorial/leap-mol2.php &
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/Tutorial/leap-mol3.php) all the charge
> values seems reasonable...
>
> I hope this helps...
>
> regards, Francois
>
> PS By now, any user can follow the R.E.D. Server .log file (provides
> the status of the job) from the Qstat interface...
>     See http://cluster.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/qstat/
>
>
>> I am using Gaussian 09 version c.01 to perfrom optimization and esp
>> density calculation.  When I used Antechamber to generate prepi file
>> using RESP charge, I fond many atom have charge larger than 1 or
>> smaller than -1.  Here is my gaussian input:
>> ====
>> %chk=./KP92_ESP_Low.chk
>> #HF/6-31G* SCF=Tight Pop=MK Geom=AllCheck Guess=Read
>> IOp(6/33=2,6/41=4,6/42=4)
>>
>> KP92 ESP charge high density
>>
>> 1 1
>> ==========
>>
>>  I am using the following command to generate prepi file:
>> antechamber -fi gout -i KP92_Esp_Low.log -fo prepi -o KP92_Low.prepi
>> -c resp -j 4 -at amber -rn KP92
>>
>> Here is the file I generated:
>> =========
>>
>> $ more KP92_Low.prepi
>>     0    0    2
>>
>> This is a remark line
>> molecule.res
>> KP92   INT  0
>> CORRECT     OMIT DU   BEG
>>   0.0000
>>    1  DUMM  DU    M    0  -1  -2     0.000      .0        .0      .00000
>>    2  DUMM  DU    M    1   0  -1     1.449      .0        .0      .00000
>>    3  DUMM  DU    M    2   1   0     1.522   111.1        .0      .00000
>>    4  O3    O     M    3   2   1     1.540   111.208   180.000 -1.501803
>>    5  C7    C     M    4   3   2     1.226    68.464   -43.436  2.155189
>>    6  C8    CT    3    5   4   3     1.513   123.380   -31.018  4.993839
>>    7  H11   HC    E    6   5   4     1.094   113.517  -172.179 -1.612854
>>    8  H12   HC    E    6   5   4     1.096   108.824    66.261 -1.612854
>>    9  H13   HC    E    6   5   4     1.093   108.913   -50.338 -1.612854
>>   10  N3    N     M    5   4   3     1.380   120.343   149.629 -4.227657
>>   11  H10   H     E   10   5   4     1.011   119.713  -165.969  1.203058
>>   12  C2    CT    M   10   5   4     1.452   117.929    -8.719  4.340736
>>   13  C1    C     B   12  10   5     1.526   111.997  -159.390 -0.741272
>>   14  O1    O     E   13  12  10     1.225   123.452  -151.271  0.037839
>>   15  O2    OS    S   13  12  10     1.325   113.176    30.494 -0.797118
>>   16  C9    CT    3   15  13  12     1.453   117.159   177.504  4.006875
>>   17  H14   H1    E   16  15  13     1.091   109.842    60.796 -1.213156
>>   18  H15   H1    E   16  15  13     1.092   109.709   -60.215 -1.213156
>>   19  H16   H1    E   16  15  13     1.088   105.038  -179.632 -1.213156
>>   20  H1    H1    E   12  10   5     1.104   107.621   -42.807 -1.164949
>>   21  C3    CT    M   12  10   5     1.547   112.374    75.545  1.281904
>>   22  H2    HC    E   21  12  10     1.094   109.757    85.172 -0.802035
>>   23  H3    HC    E   21  12  10     1.091   107.929   -32.252 -0.802035
>>   24  C4    CT    M   21  12  10     1.541   110.869  -151.779  4.097580
>>   25  H4    H1    E   24  21  12     1.091   110.308    83.816 -1.272201
>>   26  H5    H1    E   24  21  12     1.095   111.537   -35.165 -1.272201
>>   27  N1    NT    M   24  21  12     1.474   113.240  -156.118 -2.261363
>>   28  H6    H     E   27  24  21     1.013   117.985   -99.702  0.245473
>>   29  C5    CM    M   27  24  21     1.325   124.425    79.906  1.707264
>>   30  N2    NT    B   29  27  24     1.316   122.276    -2.405 -2.342325
>>   31  H9    H     E   30  29  27     1.015   118.201  -179.452  0.807641
>>   32  H17   H     E   30  29  27     1.032   123.585    -6.081  0.807641
>>   33  C6    CT    M   29  27  24     1.519   116.883   174.249  3.546339
>>   34  H7    H1    E   33  29  27     1.093   109.683    41.607 -1.007917
>>   35  H8    H1    E   33  29  27     1.093   108.694   -77.245 -1.007917
>>   36  Cl1   Cl    M   33  29  27     1.788   113.745   162.660 -1.552555
>>
>>
>> LOOP
>>
>> IMPROPER
>>    C8   N3   C7   O3
>>    C7   C2   N3  H10
>>    C2   O1   C1   O2
>>    C6   N1   C5   N2
>>
>> DONE
>> STOP
>> =========
>>
>> I attached my gaussian log file.  Could anybody help me with this big
>> number of RESP charge issue?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Apr 18 2012 - 07:00:02 PDT