Re: [AMBER] AmberGS forcefield

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:17:19 -0400

it's a backbone dihedral adjustment of ff94. In our ff99SB paper we cite
and discuss it, and show that it has some not very good properties.


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM, <steinbrt.rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> does anyone who has used the Amber forcefields in Gromacs know what the
> AmberGS ff that ships with gromacs 4.5.3 is? It gives a citation of
>
> Garcia & Sanbonmatsu, PNAS 99, 2782-2787, 2002
>
> which is also in the Amber manual but not cited? Is this an implementation
> of the Amber02 ff or something else?
>
> Thomas
>
> Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
> formerly at the
> BioMaps Institute
> Rutgers University
> 610 Taylor Rd.
> Piscataway, NJ 08854
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Mar 27 2012 - 08:30:04 PDT
Custom Search