[AMBER] PB with inp=2 doesn't recognize ff10 atom types?

From: David Minh <daveminh.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:10:45 -0400

Hi Amber folk,

After running a pmemd.cuda simulation on a normal protein prepared with tleap and leaprc.ff10, I tried to run a PBSA calculation with inp=2 using sander in AMBER 11 with the script on the bottom of this email. However, I got the error,

PB Bomb in pb_aaradi(): No radius assigned for atom 5 CA CX

This had me stuck for a little bit, but then I used leaprc.ff99SB in tleap to generate the prmtop instead. It worked perfectly and I had the same MM energies as with a GB script and the original prmtop.

I am just writing the list to provide a workaround in case somebody else runs into this problem, and also to alert developers to the possibility that PB with inp=2 might not support ff10 atom types with different names than ff99SB (if they don't already know).

Thanks,
David

** Example sander energies given the prmtop based on ff10:

minimizing coord set # 2

  Maximum number of minimization cycles reached.


                    FINAL RESULTS



   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
      1 -3.2302E+03 1.9446E+01 1.0836E+02 CG 2052

 BOND = 398.8477 ANGLE = 1119.9287 DIHED = 1505.8676
 VDWAALS = -1035.4726 EEL = -9542.4883 EGB = -2005.0136
 1-4 VDW = 522.2311 1-4 EEL = 5805.9078 RESTRAINT = 0.0000
minimization completed, ENE= -.32301916E+04 RMS= 0.194458E+02

** Example sander energies given the prmtop based on ff99SB

minimizing coord set # 2


  Maximum number of minimization cycles reached.


                    FINAL RESULTS



   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
      1 -2.6930E+03 1.9490E+01 1.0846E+02 CG 2052

 BOND = 398.8477 ANGLE = 1119.9287 DIHED = 1505.8676
 VDWAALS = -1035.4726 EEL = -9542.4883 EPB = -1894.4982
 1-4 VDW = 522.2311 1-4 EEL = 5805.9078 RESTRAINT = 0.0000
 ECAVITY = 1144.2085 EDISPER = -717.5027
minimization completed, ENE= -.26929704E+04 RMS= 0.194899E+02

** GB script:

Calculate GB energies
&cntrl
  imin=5, maxcyc=0, ncyc=0, ! read trajectory in for analysis
  ntx=1, ! input is read formatted with no velocities
  ntb=0, ! no periodicity and no PME
  idecomp=0, ! no decomposition
  ntc=2, ! SHAKE
  ntf=2, ! omit interactions with H-atoms
  cut=1000.0, ! no cutoff (>999.0)
  nsnb=99999, ! don't update non-bonded list
  temp0=300.0, ! 300 K
  igb=5, ! Updated OBC implicit solvent
  saltcon=0.025, ! 25 mM salt
  ioutfm=1, ! Binary NetCDF output
/

** PBSA script:

Calculate Poisson-Boltzmann energies
&cntrl
  imin=5, maxcyc=0, ncyc=0, ! read trajectory in for analysis
  ntx=1, ! input is read formatted with no velocities
  ntb=0, ! no periodicity and no PME
  idecomp=0, ! no decomposition
  ntc=2, ! SHAKE
  ntf=2, ! omit interactions with H-atoms
  cut=1000.0, ! no cutoff (>999.0)
  nsnb=99999, ! don't update non-bonded list
  temp0=300.0, ! 300 K
  ipb=2, ! PBSA
  inp=2, ! Two terms for nonpolar solvation energy
  ioutfm=1, ! Binary NetCDF output
/
&pb
  istrng=25, ! 25 mM salt
  pbtemp=300.0, ! 300 K
  epsout=80.0, epsin=1.0,
  radiopt=1, ! use radii (missing parameter from terminal residue?)
  dprob=1.6,
  space=0.5, nbuffer=0, fillratio=4.0,
  accept=0.001,
  cutnb=0, eneopt=2,
  decompopt=2, ! sigma decomposition scheme (Luo's paper)
  use_rmin=1, ! use van der Waals rmin values
  sprob=0.557, ! recommended for sigma decomposition scheme
  vprob=1.300,
  rhow_effect=1.129, ! recommended for sigma decomposition scheme
  use_sav=1, ! use molecular volume enclosed by SASA
  cavity_surften=0.0378, ! recommended by Luo
  cavity_offset=-0.5692, ! recommended by Luo
/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Mar 17 2012 - 11:30:03 PDT
Custom Search