Re: [AMBER] Viewing with VMD bonds set by the "bond" command

From: Lorenzo Gontrani <l.gontrani.caspur.it>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:42:00 +0100

Why don't you check the topology with rdparm (and its "bonds" command)?

Lorenzo Gontrani

2012/3/8 Francesco Pietra <chiendarret.gmail.com>:
> Hello
>
> Bonds were set in xleap (ambertools 1.5), between newly created
> residues, with command:
>
> bond unitname.residuenumber1.atomnameX     unitname.residuenumber2.atomnameY
>
>  "check unitname" after each "bond" command revealed some contac
> between certain atoms. Bond/angle parameters and unit OK. The log file
> (verbosity 2) does not reveal anomalies. All involved residues are in
> the same unit.
>
> When the obtained top/crd file are loaded to VMD, the bonds, set as
> above indicated, are not seen, i.e., the two indicated atoms are not
> connected by a line.
>
> What should I further check to check whether the bonds were established or not?
>
> thanks
>
> francesco pietra
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber



-- 
=======================================
 Lorenzo Gontrani
 Research associate of EDXD group
 University of Rome "La Sapienza"
 GSM +39 338 7615798
 Email l DOT gontrani AT caspur DOT it
 Webpage: http://webcaminiti/gontrani.html
 =======================================
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Mar 08 2012 - 01:00:03 PST
Custom Search